TY - JOUR
T1 - The differential impact of early graft dysfunction in kidney donation after brain death and after circulatory death
T2 - Insights from the Dutch National Transplant Registry
AU - Steenvoorden, Thei S.
AU - Evers, Lara
AU - Vogt, Liffert
AU - Rood, Janneke A.J.
AU - Kers, Jesper
AU - Baas, Marije C.
AU - Christiaans, Maarten H.L.
AU - Lindeman, Jan H.N.
AU - Sanders, Jan Stephan F.
AU - de Vries, Aiko P.J.
AU - van Zuilen, Arjan D.
AU - Bemelman, Frederike J.
AU - Peters-Sengers, Hessel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) perform similarly to kidneys donated after brain death (DBD). However, the respective incidences of delayed graft function (DGF) differ. This questions the donor type-specific impact of early graft function on long-term outcomes. Using competing risk and Cox-regression analysis, we compared death-censored graft loss between types of early graft function: DGF (temporary dialysis dependency started within 7 days after transplantation), slow graft function (3-day plasma creatinine decline less than 10% per day), and immediate graft function. In 1061 DBD and 1605 DCD graft recipients (January 2014 until January 2023), graft survival was similar. DGF was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD and DCD (adjusted hazard ratios: DGF in DBD: 1.79 [1.04-2.91], P = .027, DGF in DCD: 1.84 [1.18-2.87], P = .008; Reference: no DGF). Slow graft function was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD, but not significantly in DCD (adjusted hazard ratios DBD: 2.82 (1.34-5.93), P = .007, and DCD: 1.54 (0.72-3.35), P = .262; Reference: immediate graft function). Early graft dysfunction has a differential impact on graft outcome in DBD and DCD. The differences between DBD and DCD should be accounted for in research and the clinic.
AB - Kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) perform similarly to kidneys donated after brain death (DBD). However, the respective incidences of delayed graft function (DGF) differ. This questions the donor type-specific impact of early graft function on long-term outcomes. Using competing risk and Cox-regression analysis, we compared death-censored graft loss between types of early graft function: DGF (temporary dialysis dependency started within 7 days after transplantation), slow graft function (3-day plasma creatinine decline less than 10% per day), and immediate graft function. In 1061 DBD and 1605 DCD graft recipients (January 2014 until January 2023), graft survival was similar. DGF was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD and DCD (adjusted hazard ratios: DGF in DBD: 1.79 [1.04-2.91], P = .027, DGF in DCD: 1.84 [1.18-2.87], P = .008; Reference: no DGF). Slow graft function was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD, but not significantly in DCD (adjusted hazard ratios DBD: 2.82 (1.34-5.93), P = .007, and DCD: 1.54 (0.72-3.35), P = .262; Reference: immediate graft function). Early graft dysfunction has a differential impact on graft outcome in DBD and DCD. The differences between DBD and DCD should be accounted for in research and the clinic.
KW - acute kidney injury
KW - death-censored graft loss
KW - deceased-donor kidney transplantation
KW - delayed graft function
KW - donation after brain death
KW - donation after circulatory death
KW - slow graft function
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206939702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 39343037
AN - SCOPUS:85206939702
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 25
SP - 556
EP - 566
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 3
ER -