Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The complication sum score: A Delphi-based approach to summarize treatment related complications for esophageal cancer

  • M. L. Frederiks*
  • , M. Berbée
  • , B. P.L. Wijnhoven
  • , E. Schuit
  • , P. S.N. van Rossum
  • , G. J. Meijer
  • , S. Mook
  • , J. J.M.E. Nuyttens
  • , H. Rütten
  • , M. D. den Hartogh
  • , B. van Etten
  • , J. A. Langendijk
  • , H. W.M. van Laarhoven
  • , C. T. Muijs
  • , C. T. Muijs
  • , B. P.L. Wijnhoven
  • , H. W.M. van Laarhoven
  • , M. Berbee
  • , J. A. Langendijk
  • , H. P. van der Laan
  • A. van der Schaaf, J. J.M.E. Nuyttens, H. Rutten, Y. L.B. Klaver, M. L. Frederiks*, R. H.A. Verhoeven, B. van Etten, J. J. de Haan, W. Kleder, M. I. van Berge Henegouwen, Z. van Kesteren, B. Mostert, W. Schillemans, M. Sosef, F. A.R.M. Warmerdam, R. Canters, J. P. Ruurda, N. Haj Mohammad, B. Klarenbeek, M. D. den Hartogh, H. Westdorp,
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposePrevention of treatment-related complications remains a major challenge in esophageal cancer (EC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) ± surgery. A single measure, reflecting the total complication burden, may provide a clear overall picture of patient burden and enables a direct comparison of alternative treatment strategies. We developed a Complication Sum Score (CSS) to quantify symptomatic complications.Materials and methodsA Delphi consensus procedure was used to develop the CCS using the expertise of health professionals to assess the impact of a spectrum of complications. The impact of each complication was scored on a 0–100 scale. Consensus for these scores was defined as an interquartile range ≤ 20. The association between the CSS and hospital/ICU stay, overall survival (OS) at 1 year and quality of life (QoL) was assessed in a multicenter dataset of patients with EC, using multivariable (logistic) regression analysis, correcting for possible confounders.ResultsForty-five experts completed the two-round Delphi procedure. Consensus was reached for all (36) complications. In 1225 patients, that underwent nCRT and esophagectomy, a higher CSS was significantly associated with a longer hospital (coefficient = 0.43[0.38–0.48], p < 0.01) and ICU stay (coefficient = 0.23[0.19–0.26], p < 0.01), and a worse OS (odds ratio = 1.005[1.004–1.006], p < 0.01). Among the patients that completed a QoL questionnaire after surgery (n = 98) an increased CSS was associated with worse QoL (coefficient = -0.24[-0.01–0.49], p = 0.06).ConclusionThe CSS offers a comprehensive tool to quantify treatment-related complications in a single score in EC patients that receive nCRT followed by surgical resection.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101146
JournalClinical and translational radiation oncology
Volume59
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2026

Keywords

  • Delphi consensus
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
  • Normal tissue complication probability
  • Treatment-related toxicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The complication sum score: A Delphi-based approach to summarize treatment related complications for esophageal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this