Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The case for embracing trial-and-error in health research: Rethinking failure and uncertainty as foundations of progress

  • Stefan Gaillard*
  • , Stefan van Geelen
  • , Landstra elvira
  • , Arno W. Hoes
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Uncertainty is a daily reality in the health domain. Clinicians routinely face it when diagnosing patients, predicting outcomes, and selecting treatments in partnership with patients. Patients and their families, in turn, experience uncertainty about their condition and what the future may hold. Biomedical and clinical researchers aim to reduce this uncertainty through rigorous research, but not all of it succeeds. As others have argued, tolerating uncertainty may be one of medicine’s next revolutions (Simpkin & Schwartzstein, 2016), yet the process of trial-and-error in science remains underacknowledged and underexplored. Sharing failures can save time and resources, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Still, most failed research disappears into the proverbial file drawer (Feng et al., 2024; Turner et al., 2022), leaving valuable lessons unlearned.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of trial and error
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sept 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The case for embracing trial-and-error in health research: Rethinking failure and uncertainty as foundations of progress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this