TY - JOUR
T1 - The Association Between Attachment Style and Symptomatic, Social, and Personal Recovery
T2 - A Comparison Between Male and Female Patients Remitted From Their First-Episode Psychosis
AU - de With, Justine
AU - van der Eng, Kit
AU - Sommer, Iris E.
AU - van der Pluijm, Marieke
AU - Schirmbeck, Frederike
AU - de Haan, Lieuwe
AU - Sommer, Iris E.
AU - de Haan, Lieuwe
AU - Veling, Wim
AU - van Os, Jim
AU - Smit, Filip
AU - Begemann, Marieke
AU - Schuite-Koops, Sanne
AU - Marcelis, Machteld
AU - Kikkert, Martijn
AU - van Beveren, Nico
AU - Boonstra, Nynke
AU - Rosema, Bram Sieben
AU - Bakker, P. Roberto
AU - Gülöksüz, Sinan
AU - Lokkerbol, Joran
AU - Brand, Bodyl
AU - Gangadin, Shiral
AU - Geraets, Chris
AU - Van’t Hag, Erna
AU - Oomen, Priscilla
AU - Voppel, Alban
AU - van Amelsvoort, Therese
AU - Bak, Maarten
AU - Been, Agaath
AU - van den Bosch, Marinte
AU - van den Brink, Truus
AU - Faber, Gunnar
AU - Grootens, Koen
AU - de Jonge, Martin
AU - Knegtering, Henderikus
AU - Kurkamp, Jörg
AU - Mahabir, Amrita
AU - Pijnenborg, Gerdina Hendrika Maria
AU - Staring, Tonnie
AU - Vaes, Wiek
AU - Veen, Natalie
AU - Veerman, Selene
AU - Wiersma, Sybren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2026/3
Y1 - 2026/3
N2 - Background: Sex differences in recovery outcomes for psychosis have been observed. In patients with psychosis, rates of insecure attachment are significantly higher in patients of both sexes compared to the general population and have been linked to several aspects of recovery. However, the possible differential effect of attachment style on recovery between men and women with psychosis is currently unknown. Methods: This study was performed in a subsample of 299 patients remitted from their first-episode psychosis (FEP) within the Handling Antipsychotic Medication Long-term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment (HAMLETT) study. First, t-tests were used to explore sex differences in baseline attachment style. Second, stepwise regression analyses were used to examine the association between baseline attachment style and symptomatic, social and personal recovery at three and 48 months follow-up, and the possible moderation effect of sex on these associations. Third, stepwise regression analyses were repeated with longitudinal change in symptomatic, social and personal recovery between three and 48 months follow-up as outcome measure. Results: Male and female patients did not differ in baseline attachment style. Baseline attachment style was associated with recovery outcome at 3-months follow-up, whilst sex did not moderate this relationship. Baseline attachment style did not predict recovery outcome at 48-months follow-up, nor change in recovery outcome. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that attachment style is an important predictor of short-term recovery outcome in patients with FEP, whilst sex differences do not appear to significantly impact this relationship.
AB - Background: Sex differences in recovery outcomes for psychosis have been observed. In patients with psychosis, rates of insecure attachment are significantly higher in patients of both sexes compared to the general population and have been linked to several aspects of recovery. However, the possible differential effect of attachment style on recovery between men and women with psychosis is currently unknown. Methods: This study was performed in a subsample of 299 patients remitted from their first-episode psychosis (FEP) within the Handling Antipsychotic Medication Long-term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment (HAMLETT) study. First, t-tests were used to explore sex differences in baseline attachment style. Second, stepwise regression analyses were used to examine the association between baseline attachment style and symptomatic, social and personal recovery at three and 48 months follow-up, and the possible moderation effect of sex on these associations. Third, stepwise regression analyses were repeated with longitudinal change in symptomatic, social and personal recovery between three and 48 months follow-up as outcome measure. Results: Male and female patients did not differ in baseline attachment style. Baseline attachment style was associated with recovery outcome at 3-months follow-up, whilst sex did not moderate this relationship. Baseline attachment style did not predict recovery outcome at 48-months follow-up, nor change in recovery outcome. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that attachment style is an important predictor of short-term recovery outcome in patients with FEP, whilst sex differences do not appear to significantly impact this relationship.
KW - attachment style
KW - clinical recovery
KW - first-episode psychosis
KW - personal recovery
KW - psychosis
KW - recovery outcome
KW - schizophrenia
KW - sex
KW - social recovery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105033421978
U2 - 10.1111/eip.70152
DO - 10.1111/eip.70152
M3 - Article
C2 - 41823691
AN - SCOPUS:105033421978
SN - 1751-7885
VL - 20
JO - Early Intervention in Psychiatry
JF - Early Intervention in Psychiatry
IS - 3
M1 - e70152
ER -