Ten principles to strengthen prognosis research

Richard D. Riley, Kym I E Snell, KGM Moons, Thomas Debray

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

This chapter provides a set of ten principles for ensuring high-quality prognosis research. There are three general principles for strengthening prognosis research: the need for study registration and protocols, use of reporting guidelines, and importance of replication and validation studies. The seven other principles concern study analysis and presentation: use of estimation and confidence intervals rather than statistical hypothesis testing; use of interaction estimates when analysing subgroups; avoidance of categorization of continuous predictor and outcome variables; multiple imputation of missing values; adjustment of new prognostic factor estimates for established factors; avoidance of univariable estimates for predictor selection when developing prognostic models; use of penalization techniques within prognostic model development to reduce overfitting and overly extreme predictions for new individuals; and use of competing risk models in frail populations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPrognosis research in healthcare
Subtitle of host publicationConcepts, Methods, and Impact
EditorsRichard D Riley, Danielle A van der Windt, Peter Croft, Karel G M Moons
Place of PublicationNew York, United States of America
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter4
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780198796619
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten principles to strengthen prognosis research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this