Technology use by older adults in the Netherlands and its associations with demographics and health outcomes

Sigrid N W Vorrink, Angelo M G E F Antonietti, Helianthe S M Kort, Thierry Troosters, Pieter Zanen, Jan-Willem J Lammers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Information and communications technology (ICT) has the potential to contribute to the quality of life of older adults. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of a broad array of ICT devices and services among Dutch older adults and to determine whether demographics and health outcomes are associated with this use. A questionnaire was dispensed among a group of Dutch older adults (≥65 years). A univariate analysis of covariance was used to analyse results. Two hundred ninety-one subjects filled out the questionnaire. Reported use of newer technologies was lower compared with older technologies. Increased age (p = 0.048, Confidence Interval [CI]: -0.73: -0.004), lower degree of education (p = 0.008, CI: -59.64: -5.59), birthplace outside of Europe (p = 0.024, CI: -21.99: -0.73), lower income (p = 0.005, CI: -46.44:25.38), less arthrosis of the hands (p = 0.042, CI: -1.38:21.11), and a lower physical functioning (p = 0.008, CI: 1.43:9.41) resulted in a lower ICT use score with an adjusted R2 of 0.311. Older adults are slower to adapt to newer technologies. It appears it is not the degree of physical restrictions, but rather the degree of adaptability to these restrictions that influence the use of ICT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188–196
Number of pages9
JournalAssistive technology : the official journal of RESNA
Volume29
Issue number4
Early online date22 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • information technology and telecommunications
  • older adults
  • universal design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technology use by older adults in the Netherlands and its associations with demographics and health outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this