TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of the role of stereotactic radiotherapy for bone metastases
AU - Spencer, Katie
AU - van der Velden, Joanne M
AU - Wong, Erin
AU - Seravalli, Enrica
AU - Sahgal, Arjun
AU - Chow, Edward
AU - Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
AU - Verkooijen, Helena M
AU - van der Linden, Yvette M
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council UK (grant number MR/N021339/1 to KLS).
Funding Information:
AS reports advisory and/or consultant roles with AbbVie, Merck, Roche and Varian (Medical Advisory Group), Elekta (Gamma Knife Icon); ex officio board member of International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society; past educational seminars with Elekta AB, Accuray Inc, Varian (CNS Teaching Faculty), BrainLAB, Medtronic Kyphon; research grant with Elekta AB; travel accommodations and/or expenses by Elekta, Varian, BrainLAB. AS also belongs to the Elekta MR Linac Research Consortium, Elekta Spine, Oligometastases, and Linac Based SRS Consortia. All other authors have no conflicts of interest directly related to this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) might improve pain and local control in patients with bone metastases compared to conventional radiotherapy, although an overall estimate of these outcomes is currently unknown.METHODS: A systematic review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting pain response and local control among patients with bone metastases from solid-organ tumours who underwent SBRT in 1-6 fractions. All studies prior to April 15th 2017 were included. Study quality was assessed by pre-defined criteria and pain response and local control rates were extracted.RESULTS: A total of 2619 studies were screened. Fifty-seven were included (reporting outcomes for 3995 patients) of which 38 reported pain response and 45 local control rates. Local control rates were high with pain response rates above those previously reported for conventional radiotherapy. Marked heterogeneity in study populations and delivered treatments were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate. Reported toxicity was limited. 73.7% of pain response studies used a retrospective cohort design and only 10.5% used the International consensus endpoint definitions of pain response. The median survival in included studies ranged from 8 to 30.4 months suggesting a high risk of selection bias in the included observational studies.CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates the potential benefit of SBRT over conventional palliative radiotherapy in improving pain due to bone metastases. Given the methodological limitations of the published literature, however, large randomized trials are now urgently required to better quantify this benefit.
AB - BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) might improve pain and local control in patients with bone metastases compared to conventional radiotherapy, although an overall estimate of these outcomes is currently unknown.METHODS: A systematic review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting pain response and local control among patients with bone metastases from solid-organ tumours who underwent SBRT in 1-6 fractions. All studies prior to April 15th 2017 were included. Study quality was assessed by pre-defined criteria and pain response and local control rates were extracted.RESULTS: A total of 2619 studies were screened. Fifty-seven were included (reporting outcomes for 3995 patients) of which 38 reported pain response and 45 local control rates. Local control rates were high with pain response rates above those previously reported for conventional radiotherapy. Marked heterogeneity in study populations and delivered treatments were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate. Reported toxicity was limited. 73.7% of pain response studies used a retrospective cohort design and only 10.5% used the International consensus endpoint definitions of pain response. The median survival in included studies ranged from 8 to 30.4 months suggesting a high risk of selection bias in the included observational studies.CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates the potential benefit of SBRT over conventional palliative radiotherapy in improving pain due to bone metastases. Given the methodological limitations of the published literature, however, large randomized trials are now urgently required to better quantify this benefit.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072186593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djz101
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djz101
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31119273
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 111
SP - 1023
EP - 1032
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 10
ER -