TY - JOUR
T1 - Synergies Between Food Biodiversity, Processing Levels, and the Eat-lancet Diet for Nutrient Adequacy and Environmental Sustainability
T2 - a multiobjective optimization using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort
AU - Berden, Jeroen
AU - Hanley-Cook, Giles T
AU - Chimera, Bernadette
AU - Cakmak, Emine Koc
AU - Nicolas, Genevieve
AU - Baudry, Julia
AU - Srour, Bernard
AU - Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
AU - Berlivet, Justine
AU - Touvier, Mathilde
AU - Deschasaux-Tanguy, Mélanie
AU - Colizzi, Chiara
AU - Marques, Chloé
AU - Millett, Christopher
AU - Jannasch, Franziska
AU - Skeie, Guri
AU - Dansero, Lucia
AU - Schulze, Matthias B
AU - Katzke, Verena
AU - van der Schouw, Yvonne T
AU - Jimenez Zabala, Ana M
AU - Tjønneland, Anne
AU - Kyrø, Cecilie
AU - Dahm, Christina C
AU - Agnoli, Claudia
AU - Ibsen, Daniel B
AU - Weiderpass, Elisabete
AU - Pasanisi, Fabrizio
AU - Severi, Gianluca
AU - Gómez, Jesus-Humberto
AU - Murray, Kris
AU - Guevara, Marcela
AU - Sanchez, Maria-José
AU - Frenoy, Pauline
AU - Zamora-Ros, Raul
AU - Tumino, Rosario
AU - Kaaks, Rudolf
AU - Pala, Valeria
AU - Vineis, Paolo
AU - Ferrari, Pietro
AU - Huybrechts, Inge
AU - Lachat, Carl
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Background: Diets have become increasingly monotonous and high in ultraprocessed foods (UPFs), contributing to poor health outcomes and environmental degradation. Although sustainable diets, food biodiversity, and food processing levels have each been linked to nutritional and environmental outcomes, their combined impact has not been assessed. Objectives: This study aims to examine whether food biodiversity, intakes of UPFs, and adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet can simultaneously optimize nutrient adequacy while reducing environmental impacts. Methods: Using data from 368,733 adults in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, we assessed associations and interactions between dietary species richness (DSR) (disaggregated into DSR
Plant and DSR
Animal), food processing levels (Nova categories; % g/d), and adherence to EAT-Lancet recommendations [healthy reference diet (HRD) score; 0–140 points] with the Probability of Adequate Nutrient Intake Diet (PANDiet) score, dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe; kg CO
2-eq/d), and land use (m
2/d). Regression models subsequently informed multiobjective optimization to identify optimal dietary patterns balancing nutritional and environmental outcomes. Results: Compared with observed diets, optimal diets showed a mean HRD score increase of 13.91 (95% confidence interval: 13.89, 13.93) points; DSR
Plant increased by mean of 1.36 (1.35, 1.37) species, and a mean substitution of 12.44 (12.40, 12.49) percentage points of UPFs with unprocessed or minimally processed foods. Correspondingly, the mean PANDiet score increased by 4.12 (4.10, 4.14) percentage points, whereas GHGe and land use reduced by 1.07 (1.05, 1.09) kg CO
2-eq/d and 1.43 (1.41, 1.45) m
2/d, respectively. Conclusions: Diets that adhere to the EAT-Lancet diet, are more biodiverse, and prioritize unprocessed and minimally processed foods over UPFs, have the potential to synergistically enhance nutrient adequacy while minimizing environmental impacts. These findings suggest that moderate improvements across multiple dietary dimensions simultaneously can achieve meaningful gains in both nutritional adequacy and environmental sustainability.
AB - Background: Diets have become increasingly monotonous and high in ultraprocessed foods (UPFs), contributing to poor health outcomes and environmental degradation. Although sustainable diets, food biodiversity, and food processing levels have each been linked to nutritional and environmental outcomes, their combined impact has not been assessed. Objectives: This study aims to examine whether food biodiversity, intakes of UPFs, and adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet can simultaneously optimize nutrient adequacy while reducing environmental impacts. Methods: Using data from 368,733 adults in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, we assessed associations and interactions between dietary species richness (DSR) (disaggregated into DSR
Plant and DSR
Animal), food processing levels (Nova categories; % g/d), and adherence to EAT-Lancet recommendations [healthy reference diet (HRD) score; 0–140 points] with the Probability of Adequate Nutrient Intake Diet (PANDiet) score, dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe; kg CO
2-eq/d), and land use (m
2/d). Regression models subsequently informed multiobjective optimization to identify optimal dietary patterns balancing nutritional and environmental outcomes. Results: Compared with observed diets, optimal diets showed a mean HRD score increase of 13.91 (95% confidence interval: 13.89, 13.93) points; DSR
Plant increased by mean of 1.36 (1.35, 1.37) species, and a mean substitution of 12.44 (12.40, 12.49) percentage points of UPFs with unprocessed or minimally processed foods. Correspondingly, the mean PANDiet score increased by 4.12 (4.10, 4.14) percentage points, whereas GHGe and land use reduced by 1.07 (1.05, 1.09) kg CO
2-eq/d and 1.43 (1.41, 1.45) m
2/d, respectively. Conclusions: Diets that adhere to the EAT-Lancet diet, are more biodiverse, and prioritize unprocessed and minimally processed foods over UPFs, have the potential to synergistically enhance nutrient adequacy while minimizing environmental impacts. These findings suggest that moderate improvements across multiple dietary dimensions simultaneously can achieve meaningful gains in both nutritional adequacy and environmental sustainability.
KW - EAT-Lancet diet
KW - environmental sustainability
KW - food biodiversity
KW - multiobjective optimization
KW - nutrient adequacy
KW - ultraprocessed foods
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024727567
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.11.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.11.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 41260521
SN - 0002-9165
VL - 123
JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 2
M1 - 101115
ER -