Synergies Between Food Biodiversity, Processing Levels, and the Eat-lancet Diet for Nutrient Adequacy and Environmental Sustainability: a multiobjective optimization using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort

  • Jeroen Berden
  • , Giles T Hanley-Cook
  • , Bernadette Chimera
  • , Emine Koc Cakmak
  • , Genevieve Nicolas
  • , Julia Baudry
  • , Bernard Srour
  • , Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot
  • , Justine Berlivet
  • , Mathilde Touvier
  • , Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy
  • , Chiara Colizzi
  • , Chloé Marques
  • , Christopher Millett
  • , Franziska Jannasch
  • , Guri Skeie
  • , Lucia Dansero
  • , Matthias B Schulze
  • , Verena Katzke
  • , Yvonne T van der Schouw
  • Ana M Jimenez Zabala, Anne Tjønneland, Cecilie Kyrø, Christina C Dahm, Claudia Agnoli, Daniel B Ibsen, Elisabete Weiderpass, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Gianluca Severi, Jesus-Humberto Gómez, Kris Murray, Marcela Guevara, Maria-José Sanchez, Pauline Frenoy, Raul Zamora-Ros, Rosario Tumino, Rudolf Kaaks, Valeria Pala, Paolo Vineis, Pietro Ferrari, Inge Huybrechts, Carl Lachat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Diets have become increasingly monotonous and high in ultraprocessed foods (UPFs), contributing to poor health outcomes and environmental degradation. Although sustainable diets, food biodiversity, and food processing levels have each been linked to nutritional and environmental outcomes, their combined impact has not been assessed. Objectives: This study aims to examine whether food biodiversity, intakes of UPFs, and adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet can simultaneously optimize nutrient adequacy while reducing environmental impacts. Methods: Using data from 368,733 adults in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, we assessed associations and interactions between dietary species richness (DSR) (disaggregated into DSR Plant and DSR Animal), food processing levels (Nova categories; % g/d), and adherence to EAT-Lancet recommendations [healthy reference diet (HRD) score; 0–140 points] with the Probability of Adequate Nutrient Intake Diet (PANDiet) score, dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe; kg CO 2-eq/d), and land use (m 2/d). Regression models subsequently informed multiobjective optimization to identify optimal dietary patterns balancing nutritional and environmental outcomes. Results: Compared with observed diets, optimal diets showed a mean HRD score increase of 13.91 (95% confidence interval: 13.89, 13.93) points; DSR Plant increased by mean of 1.36 (1.35, 1.37) species, and a mean substitution of 12.44 (12.40, 12.49) percentage points of UPFs with unprocessed or minimally processed foods. Correspondingly, the mean PANDiet score increased by 4.12 (4.10, 4.14) percentage points, whereas GHGe and land use reduced by 1.07 (1.05, 1.09) kg CO 2-eq/d and 1.43 (1.41, 1.45) m 2/d, respectively. Conclusions: Diets that adhere to the EAT-Lancet diet, are more biodiverse, and prioritize unprocessed and minimally processed foods over UPFs, have the potential to synergistically enhance nutrient adequacy while minimizing environmental impacts. These findings suggest that moderate improvements across multiple dietary dimensions simultaneously can achieve meaningful gains in both nutritional adequacy and environmental sustainability.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101115
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume123
Issue number2
Early online date17 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026

Keywords

  • EAT-Lancet diet
  • environmental sustainability
  • food biodiversity
  • multiobjective optimization
  • nutrient adequacy
  • ultraprocessed foods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Synergies Between Food Biodiversity, Processing Levels, and the Eat-lancet Diet for Nutrient Adequacy and Environmental Sustainability: a multiobjective optimization using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this