SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions

Translated title of the contribution: SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions
Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	1475-1477
Number of pages	3
Journal	European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Volume	40
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2484-x
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

@article{5b13303f3c1245018c1903dbb13db9ff,

title = "SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions",

author = "T.C. Kwee and G. Cheng and M.G.E.H. Lam and S. Basu and A. Alavi",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1007/s00259-013-2484-x",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "40",

pages = "1475--1477",

journal = "European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging",

issn = "1619-7070",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions

AU - Kwee, T.C.

AU - Cheng, G.

AU - Lam, M.G.E.H.

AU - Basu, S.

AU - Alavi, A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

U2 - 10.1007/s00259-013-2484-x

DO - 10.1007/s00259-013-2484-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23801170

SN - 1619-7070

VL - 40

SP - 1475

EP - 1477

JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

IS - 10

ER -