Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG)

  • Thomas F Stoop
  • , Simone Augustinus
  • , Bergthor Björnsson
  • , Bobby Tingstedt
  • , Bodil Andersson
  • , Christopher L Wolfgang
  • , Jens Werner
  • , Karin Johansen
  • , Martijn W J Stommel
  • , Matthew H G Katz
  • , Michael Ghadimi
  • , Michael G House
  • , Poya Ghorbani
  • , I Quintus Molenaar
  • , Roeland F de Wilde
  • , J Sven D Mieog
  • , Tobias Keck
  • , Ulrich F Wellner
  • , Waldemar Uhl
  • , Marc G Besselink
  • Henry A Pitt, Marco Del Chiaro,

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma located in the pancreatic body might require a portomesenteric venous resection (PVR), but data regarding surgical risks after distal pancreatectomy (DP) with PVR are sparse. Insight into additional surgical risks of DP-PVR could support preoperative counseling and intraoperative decision making. This study aimed to provide insight into the surgical outcome of DP-PVR, including its potential risk elevation over standard DP.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent DP ± PVR (2018-2020), registered in four audits for pancreatic surgery from North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Patients who underwent concomitant arterial and/or multivisceral resection(s) were excluded. Predictors for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity and mortality were investigated by logistic regression, correcting for each audit.

RESULTS: Overall, 2924 patients after DP were included, of whom 241 patients (8.2%) underwent DP-PVR. Rates of major morbidity (24% vs. 18%; p = 0.024) and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage grade B/C (10% vs. 3%; p = 0.041) were higher after DP-PVR compared with standard DP. Mortality after DP-PVR and standard DP did not differ significantly (2% vs. 1%; p = 0.542). Predictors for major morbidity were PVR (odds ratio [OR] 1.500, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086-2.071) and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 1.420, 95% CI 1.032-1.970). Predictors for mortality were higher age (OR 1.087, 95% CI 1.045-1.132), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.167, 95% CI 1.852-9.374), and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 2.919, 95% CI 1.197-7.118), whereas concomitant PVR was not associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: PVR during DP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body is associated with increased morbidity, but can be performed safely in terms of mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8327-8339
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of surgical oncology
Volume31
Issue number12
Early online date9 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Distal pancreatectomy
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Surgical outcome
  • Venous resection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this