TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgery versus conservative management for recurrent and ongoing left-sided diverticulitis (DIRECT trial)
T2 - an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
AU - van de Wall, Bryan J M
AU - Stam, Marguerite A W
AU - Draaisma, Werner A.
AU - Stellato, R.
AU - Bemelman, Willem A.
AU - Boermeester, Marja A.
AU - Broeders, Ivo A M J
AU - Belgers, Eric J.
AU - Toorenvliet, Boudewijn R.
AU - Prins, Hubert A.
AU - Consten, Esther C J
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/1
Y1 - 2017/1
N2 - Background Patients with recurrent or persisting complaints after an episode of left-sided diverticulitis are managed with either conservative measures or elective sigmoidectomy. To date, there are no data from randomised trials. We aimed to establish which treatment leads to a better quality of life for patients with diverticulitis. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (DIRECT trial) in 24 teaching and two academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18–75 years presenting with either recurrent (three or more presentations with clinical signs of acute diverticulitis within 2 years) or persistent abdominal complaints (ongoing lower left abdominal pain or persistent change in bowel habits for ≥3 months) after an episode of left-sided diverticulitis, confirmed by CT, ultrasound, or endoscopy, were included. Patients were excluded if they had previous elective or emergency surgery for acute sigmoid diverticulitis, an absolute operation indication, suspicion of a colorectal malignancy, with a preoperative or postoperative risk greater than III (on the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification), or were unable to complete questionnaire or follow-up. Patients were randomly assigned (3:3) to receive conservative management or elective (laparoscopic) sigmoidectomy using a digital randomisation system, stratified by type of disease and centre, with a block size of six. Patients, physicians, and researchers were not masked to treatment allocation. Our primary endpoint was health-related quality of life, measured by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) at 6 months after inclusion or surgery, depending on randomisation group. This trial is registered with trialregister.nl, number NTR1478, and is closed for inclusion. Findings Between July 1, 2010, and April 1, 2014, we randomly assigned 109 patients to receive surgical treatment (resection; n=53) or conservative management (n=56), after which the Data Safety and Monitoring Board prematurely terminated the trial because of increasing difficulties in recruitment. 47 (89%) of 53 patients received surgical treatment and 43 (77%) of 56 patients received conservative management. The GIQLI score at 6 months' follow-up was significantly higher in patients randomly assigned to receive surgical treatment (mean 114·4 [SD 22·3]) than conservative management (100·4 [22·7]; mean difference 14·2, 95% CI 7·2–21·1, p
AB - Background Patients with recurrent or persisting complaints after an episode of left-sided diverticulitis are managed with either conservative measures or elective sigmoidectomy. To date, there are no data from randomised trials. We aimed to establish which treatment leads to a better quality of life for patients with diverticulitis. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (DIRECT trial) in 24 teaching and two academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18–75 years presenting with either recurrent (three or more presentations with clinical signs of acute diverticulitis within 2 years) or persistent abdominal complaints (ongoing lower left abdominal pain or persistent change in bowel habits for ≥3 months) after an episode of left-sided diverticulitis, confirmed by CT, ultrasound, or endoscopy, were included. Patients were excluded if they had previous elective or emergency surgery for acute sigmoid diverticulitis, an absolute operation indication, suspicion of a colorectal malignancy, with a preoperative or postoperative risk greater than III (on the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification), or were unable to complete questionnaire or follow-up. Patients were randomly assigned (3:3) to receive conservative management or elective (laparoscopic) sigmoidectomy using a digital randomisation system, stratified by type of disease and centre, with a block size of six. Patients, physicians, and researchers were not masked to treatment allocation. Our primary endpoint was health-related quality of life, measured by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) at 6 months after inclusion or surgery, depending on randomisation group. This trial is registered with trialregister.nl, number NTR1478, and is closed for inclusion. Findings Between July 1, 2010, and April 1, 2014, we randomly assigned 109 patients to receive surgical treatment (resection; n=53) or conservative management (n=56), after which the Data Safety and Monitoring Board prematurely terminated the trial because of increasing difficulties in recruitment. 47 (89%) of 53 patients received surgical treatment and 43 (77%) of 56 patients received conservative management. The GIQLI score at 6 months' follow-up was significantly higher in patients randomly assigned to receive surgical treatment (mean 114·4 [SD 22·3]) than conservative management (100·4 [22·7]; mean difference 14·2, 95% CI 7·2–21·1, p
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013011614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30109-1
DO - 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30109-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85013011614
SN - 2468-1253
VL - 2
SP - 13
EP - 22
JO - The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 1
ER -