TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting Primary Care Professionals to Stay in Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic
T2 - Views on Personal Risk and Access to Testing During the First Wave of Pandemic in Europe
AU - Wanat, Marta
AU - Hoste, Melanie
AU - Gobat, Nina
AU - Anastasaki, Marilena
AU - Böhmer, Femke
AU - Chlabicz, Slawomir
AU - Colliers, Annelies
AU - Farrell, Karen
AU - Karkana, Maria-Nefeli
AU - Kinsman, John
AU - Lionis, Christos
AU - Marcinowicz, Ludmila
AU - Reinhardt, Katrin
AU - Skoglund, Ingmarie
AU - Sundvall, Pär-Daniel
AU - Vellinga, Akke
AU - Goossens, Herman
AU - Butler, Christopher C
AU - van der Velden, Alike
AU - Anthierens, Sibyl
AU - Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
N1 - Funding Information:
All authors have been supported by the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme (Grant No. 101003589). The funding also covers publication fees. ST-C and CB received additional funding from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) [HPRU-2012-10041].
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Wanat, Hoste, Gobat, Anastasaki, Böhmer, Chlabicz, Colliers, Farrell, Karkana, Kinsman, Lionis, Marcinowicz, Reinhardt, Skoglund, Sundvall, Vellinga, Goossens, Butler, Velden, Anthierens and Tonkin-Crine.
PY - 2021/9/10
Y1 - 2021/9/10
N2 - Background: Minimising primary care professionals' (PCPs) risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial to ensure their safety as well as functioning health care system. PCPs' perspectives on the support they needed in the early stages of a public health crisis can inform future preparedness. Aim: To understand PCPs' experiences of providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with focus on personal risk from COVID-19 and testing. Design and Setting: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with PCPs in England, Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Greece and Sweden, between April and July 2020. Method: Interviews were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis techniques. Results: Eighty interviews were conducted, showing that PCPs tried to make sense of their risk of both contracting and severity of COVID-19 by assessing individual risk factors and perceived effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). They had limited access to PPE yet continued providing care as their "duty." Some PCPs felt that they were put in high-risk situations when patients or colleagues were not flagging symptoms of COVID-19. Not having access to testing in the initial stages of the pandemic was somewhat accepted but when available, was valued. Conclusion: Access to adequate PPE and testing, as well as training for staff and education for patients about the importance of ensuring staff safety is crucial. Given PCPs' varied response in how they appraised personal risk and their tolerance for working, PCPs may benefit from the autonomy in deciding how they want to work during health emergencies.
AB - Background: Minimising primary care professionals' (PCPs) risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial to ensure their safety as well as functioning health care system. PCPs' perspectives on the support they needed in the early stages of a public health crisis can inform future preparedness. Aim: To understand PCPs' experiences of providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with focus on personal risk from COVID-19 and testing. Design and Setting: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with PCPs in England, Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Greece and Sweden, between April and July 2020. Method: Interviews were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis techniques. Results: Eighty interviews were conducted, showing that PCPs tried to make sense of their risk of both contracting and severity of COVID-19 by assessing individual risk factors and perceived effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). They had limited access to PPE yet continued providing care as their "duty." Some PCPs felt that they were put in high-risk situations when patients or colleagues were not flagging symptoms of COVID-19. Not having access to testing in the initial stages of the pandemic was somewhat accepted but when available, was valued. Conclusion: Access to adequate PPE and testing, as well as training for staff and education for patients about the importance of ensuring staff safety is crucial. Given PCPs' varied response in how they appraised personal risk and their tolerance for working, PCPs may benefit from the autonomy in deciding how they want to work during health emergencies.
KW - healthcare profession
KW - patient-centred care
KW - primary care/general practice
KW - qualitative analysis
KW - remote
KW - setting of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115700562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmed.2021.726319
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2021.726319
M3 - Article
C2 - 34568383
SN - 2296-858X
VL - 8
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Frontiers in medicine
JF - Frontiers in medicine
M1 - 726319
ER -