Abstract
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) in surgery may not always be ethical, feasible, or necessary to address a particular research question about the effect of a surgical intervention. If so, properly designed and conducted observational (non-randomized) studies may be valuable alternatives for an RCT and produce credible results. In this paper, we discus differences between RCTs and observational studies and differentiate between three types of comparisons of surgical interventions. We assert that results of different designs should be regarded as complementary to each other when evaluating surgical interventions. Criteria for credible observational research are presented to provide guidance for future observational research of surgical interventions. We argue that the research question that is being asked should guide the discussion about the value of a particular study design.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 479-484 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2021 |
Keywords
- Emergency Medical Services
- Humans
- Research Design
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Study methodology in trauma care: towards question-based study designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver