TY - JOUR
T1 - Status of Sepsis Care in European Hospitals Results from an International Cross-Sectional Survey
AU - Scheer, Christian S.
AU - Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Evangelos J.
AU - Ferrer, Ricard
AU - Idelevich, Evgeny A.
AU - Annane, Djillali
AU - Artigas, Antonio
AU - Aslan, Abdullah Tarik
AU - Bottari, Gabriella
AU - Bouma, Hjalmar R.
AU - Černý, Vladimir
AU - Radivojević, Renata Curić
AU - Dakou, Konstantina
AU - Dewitte, Ken
AU - Elbahnasawy, Mohamed
AU - Gründling, Matthias
AU - Gurjar, Mohan
AU - Hästbacka, Johanna
AU - Kyprianou, Miltiadis
AU - Laribi, Said
AU - Lassen, Annmarie
AU - Lebedinskii, Konstantin
AU - Máca, Jan
AU - Malbrain, Manu L.N.G.
AU - Monti, Gianpaola
AU - Ostermann, Marlies
AU - Osthoff, Michael
AU - Paiva, José Artur
AU - Sabbatucci, Michela
AU - Śmiechowicz, Jakub
AU - Ştefan, Mihai Gabriel
AU - Vollmer, Marcus
AU - Vuković, Natalija
AU - Zaragkoulias, Kyriakos
AU - Reinhart, Konrad
AU - Linder, Adam
AU - Filipescu, Daniela
AU - Abdel-Elsalam, Wafaa
AU - Abed, Alaa
AU - Abedinov, Fillip
AU - Abramyan, Marina
AU - Adams, Katie
AU - Afset, Jan Egil
AU - Cremer, Olaf L.
AU - Dekker, Douwe
AU - Diaz, Juan Jose Diaz
AU - Jie, Kim
AU - Kaasjager, Karin
AU - Kumar, Anil
AU - Vrijsen, Bram
AU - Wösten-Van Asperen, Roelie M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 by the American Thoracic Society.
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Rationale: Early detection, standardized therapy, adequate infrastructure, and strategies for quality improvement should constitute essential components of every hospital’s sepsis plan. Objectives: To investigate the extent to which recommendations from the sepsis guidelines are implemented and the availability of infrastructure for the care of patients with sepsis in acute-care hospitals. Methods: A multidisciplinary cross-sectional questionnaire was used to investigate sepsis care in hospitals. This included the use of sepsis definitions, the implementation of sepsis guideline recommendations, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, antibiotic stewardship, and quality improvement initiatives (QIIs) in hospitals. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,023 hospitals in 69 countries were included. Most of them, 835 (81.6%), were in Europe. Sepsis screening was used in 54.2% of emergency departments (EDs), 47.9% of wards, and 61.7% of ICUs. Sepsis management was standardized in 57.3% of EDs, 45.2% of wards, and 70.7% of ICUs. The implementation of comprehensive QIIs was associated with increased screening (EDs, 133.3%; wards, 144.4%; ICUs, 123.8% absolute difference) and increased standardized sepsis management (EDs, 133.6%; wards, 140.0%; ICUs, 117.7% absolute difference) compared with hospitals without QIIs. A total of 9.8% of hospitals had implemented ongoing QIIs, and 4.6% had invested in sepsis programs. Conclusions: The findings indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in a large number of mainly European hospitals, particularly with regard to early identification and standardized management of sepsis, the availability of guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, and the implementation of QIIs. Further efforts are required to implement a more comprehensive and appropriate quality of care.
AB - Rationale: Early detection, standardized therapy, adequate infrastructure, and strategies for quality improvement should constitute essential components of every hospital’s sepsis plan. Objectives: To investigate the extent to which recommendations from the sepsis guidelines are implemented and the availability of infrastructure for the care of patients with sepsis in acute-care hospitals. Methods: A multidisciplinary cross-sectional questionnaire was used to investigate sepsis care in hospitals. This included the use of sepsis definitions, the implementation of sepsis guideline recommendations, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, antibiotic stewardship, and quality improvement initiatives (QIIs) in hospitals. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,023 hospitals in 69 countries were included. Most of them, 835 (81.6%), were in Europe. Sepsis screening was used in 54.2% of emergency departments (EDs), 47.9% of wards, and 61.7% of ICUs. Sepsis management was standardized in 57.3% of EDs, 45.2% of wards, and 70.7% of ICUs. The implementation of comprehensive QIIs was associated with increased screening (EDs, 133.3%; wards, 144.4%; ICUs, 123.8% absolute difference) and increased standardized sepsis management (EDs, 133.6%; wards, 140.0%; ICUs, 117.7% absolute difference) compared with hospitals without QIIs. A total of 9.8% of hospitals had implemented ongoing QIIs, and 4.6% had invested in sepsis programs. Conclusions: The findings indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in a large number of mainly European hospitals, particularly with regard to early identification and standardized management of sepsis, the availability of guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, and the implementation of QIIs. Further efforts are required to implement a more comprehensive and appropriate quality of care.
KW - quality of care
KW - sepsis management
KW - sepsis programs
KW - sepsis screening
KW - standard of care
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002348147
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.202406-1167OC
DO - 10.1164/rccm.202406-1167OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 39787606
AN - SCOPUS:105002348147
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 211
SP - 587
EP - 599
JO - American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
JF - American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
IS - 4
ER -