Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Statistical primer: how to deal with missing data in scientific research?

  • Grigorios Papageorgiou
  • , Stuart W Grant
  • , Johanna J M Takkenberg
  • , Mostafa M Mokhles*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Missing data are a common challenge encountered in research which can compromise the results of statistical inference when not handled appropriately. This paper aims to introduce basic concepts of missing data to a non-statistical audience, list and compare some of the most popular approaches for handling missing data in practice and provide guidelines and recommendations for dealing with and reporting missing data in scientific research. Complete case analysis and single imputation are simple approaches for handling missing data and are popular in practice, however, in most cases they are not guaranteed to provide valid inferences. Multiple imputation is a robust and general alternative which is appropriate for data missing at random, surpassing the disadvantages of the simpler approaches, but should always be conducted with care. The aforementioned approaches are illustrated and compared in an example application using Cox regression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-158
Number of pages6
JournalInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biomedical Research/standards
  • Clinical Studies as Topic/standards
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Models, Statistical
  • Probability
  • Research Design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical primer: how to deal with missing data in scientific research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this