TY - JOUR
T1 - Staged-informed consent in the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
AU - Young-Afat, Danny A.
AU - Verkooijen, Helena A M
AU - Van Gils, Carla H.
AU - Van Der Velden, Joanne M.
AU - Burbach, Johannes P.
AU - Elias, Sjoerd G.
AU - Van Delden, Jonannes J.
AU - Relton, Clare
AU - Van Vulpen, Marco
AU - Van Der Graaf, Rieke
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial," a new design for pragmatic trials, embeds multiple trials within a cohort. the cohort multiple rCt is an attractive alternative to conventional rCts in fields where recruitment is slow, multiple new (competing) interventions for the same condition have to be tested, new interventions are highly preferred by patients and doctors, and the risk of disappointment bias, cross-over, and contamination is considerable. to prevent these unwanted effects, the cohort multiple rCt provides information on randomization to the intervention group/arm only, and only after randomization (i.e., prerandomization). to some, especially in a clinical setting, this is not ethically acceptable. in this article, we argue that prerandomization in the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmrCt) can be avoided by adopting a staged-informed consent procedure. in the first stage, at entry into the cohort, all potential participants are asked for their informed consent to participate in a cohort study and broad consent to be either randomly selected to be approached for experimental interventions or to serve as control without further notice during participation in the cohort. in a second stage, at the initiation of an rCt within the cohort, informed consent to receive the intervention is then only sought in those randomly selected for the intervention arm. At the third stage, after completion of each rCt, all cohort participants receive aggregate disclosure of trial results. this staged-informed consent procedure avoids prerandomization in cmrCt and aims to keep participants actively engaged in the research process.
AB - The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial," a new design for pragmatic trials, embeds multiple trials within a cohort. the cohort multiple rCt is an attractive alternative to conventional rCts in fields where recruitment is slow, multiple new (competing) interventions for the same condition have to be tested, new interventions are highly preferred by patients and doctors, and the risk of disappointment bias, cross-over, and contamination is considerable. to prevent these unwanted effects, the cohort multiple rCt provides information on randomization to the intervention group/arm only, and only after randomization (i.e., prerandomization). to some, especially in a clinical setting, this is not ethically acceptable. in this article, we argue that prerandomization in the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmrCt) can be avoided by adopting a staged-informed consent procedure. in the first stage, at entry into the cohort, all potential participants are asked for their informed consent to participate in a cohort study and broad consent to be either randomly selected to be approached for experimental interventions or to serve as control without further notice during participation in the cohort. in a second stage, at the initiation of an rCt within the cohort, informed consent to receive the intervention is then only sought in those randomly selected for the intervention arm. At the third stage, after completion of each rCt, all cohort participants receive aggregate disclosure of trial results. this staged-informed consent procedure avoids prerandomization in cmrCt and aims to keep participants actively engaged in the research process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964001517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/eDe.0000000000000435
DO - 10.1097/eDe.0000000000000435
M3 - Article
C2 - 27035689
AN - SCOPUS:84964001517
SN - 1044-3983
VL - 27
SP - 389
EP - 392
JO - Epidemiology
JF - Epidemiology
IS - 3
ER -