Abstract
Radical cystectomy (RC) is traditionally considered the standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), although randomized evidence of superiority over bladder-preserving therapy (BPT) is lacking. In this nationwide study, we included all patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MIBC between 2017 and 2019 and treated with curative-intent with either RC or BPT. A total of 1,432 patients were included (1,101 RC, 331 BPT). The primary endpoint was 2‑year disease-free survival (DFS), with overall survival (OS) as the secondary endpoint. IPTW-adjusted 2‑year DFS was 61.5% for BPT and 55.3% for RC (HR 0.84; 95%-CI 0.69–1.05). Two-year OS was 74.0% for BPT versus 66.0% for RC (HR 0.80; 95%-CI 0.64–0.98). DFS was comparable between groups, while OS favored BPT.
| Translated title of the contribution | Muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the Netherlands: oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy and bladder-sparing therapy |
|---|---|
| Original language | Dutch |
| Pages (from-to) | 59-67 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Tijdschrift voor Urologie |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2026 |
Keywords
- Bladder-preserving therapy
- Brachytherapy
- Chemoradiation
- Comparison
- Disease-free survival
- Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
- Overall survival
- Radical cystectomy
- TMT
- Trimodality treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the Netherlands: oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy and bladder-sparing therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver