TY - JOUR
T1 - Speech Illusions in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Linked to Clinical Outcome
AU - Hird, Emily J.
AU - Ohmuro, Noriyuki
AU - Allen, Paul
AU - Moseley, Peter
AU - Kempton, Matthew J.
AU - Modinos, Gemma
AU - Sachs, Gabriele
AU - Van Der Gaag, Mark
AU - De Haan, Lieuwe
AU - Gadelha, Ary
AU - Bressan, Rodrigo
AU - Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
AU - Ruhrmann, Stephan
AU - Catalan, Ana
AU - McGuire, Philip
AU - Valmaggia, Lucia R.
AU - Calem, Maria
AU - Tognin, Stefania
AU - Velthorst, Eva
AU - Kraan, Tamar C.
AU - Van Dam, Daniella S.
AU - Burger, Nadine
AU - Nelson, Barnaby
AU - McGorry, Patrick
AU - Paul Amminger, Günter
AU - Pantelis, Christos
AU - Politis, Athena
AU - Goodall, Joanne
AU - Riecher-Rössler, Anita
AU - Borgwardt, Stefan
AU - Rapp, Charlotte
AU - Ittig, Sarah
AU - Studerus, Erich
AU - Smieskova, Renata
AU - Brietzke, Elisa
AU - Asevedo, Graccielle
AU - Asevedo, Elson
AU - Zugman, Andre
AU - Domínguez-Martínez, Tecelli
AU - Torrecilla, Pilar
AU - Kwapil, Thomas R.
AU - Monsonet, Manel
AU - Hinojosa, Lídia
AU - Kazes, Mathilde
AU - Daban, Claire
AU - Bourgin, Julie
AU - Gay, Olivier
AU - Mam-Lam-Fook, Celia
AU - Rutten, Bart P.
AU - Van Os, Jim
N1 - Funding Information:
The European Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) Project is funded by grant agreement HEALTH-F2- 2010-241909 (Project EU-GEI) from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme. Additional support was provided by a Medical Research Council Fellowship to M Kempton (grant MR/J008915/1), and by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación e Universidades to N Barrantes-Vidal (project PSI2017-87512-C2-1-R). Acknowledgment
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Background and hypothesis: Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined whether this was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Study design: At baseline, 344 CHR participants and 67 healthy controls were presented with a computerized white noise task and asked whether they heard speech, and whether speech was neutral, affective, or whether they were uncertain about its valence. After 2 years, we assessed whether participants transitioned to psychosis, or remitted from the CHR state, and their functioning. Study results: CHR participants had a lower sensitivity to the task. Logistic regression revealed that a bias towards hearing targets in stimuli was associated with remission status (OR = 0.21, P = 042). Conversely, hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of remission (OR = 7.72. P =. 007). When we assessed only participants who did not take antipsychotic medication at baseline, the association between hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline and remission likelihood remained (OR = 7.61, P =. 043) and this variable was additionally associated with a greater likelihood of transition to psychosis (OR = 5.34, P =. 029). Conclusions: In CHR individuals, a tendency to hear speech in noise, and uncertainty about the affective valence of this speech, is associated with adverse outcomes. This task could be used in a battery of cognitive markers to stratify CHR participants according to subsequent outcomes.
AB - Background and hypothesis: Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined whether this was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Study design: At baseline, 344 CHR participants and 67 healthy controls were presented with a computerized white noise task and asked whether they heard speech, and whether speech was neutral, affective, or whether they were uncertain about its valence. After 2 years, we assessed whether participants transitioned to psychosis, or remitted from the CHR state, and their functioning. Study results: CHR participants had a lower sensitivity to the task. Logistic regression revealed that a bias towards hearing targets in stimuli was associated with remission status (OR = 0.21, P = 042). Conversely, hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of remission (OR = 7.72. P =. 007). When we assessed only participants who did not take antipsychotic medication at baseline, the association between hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline and remission likelihood remained (OR = 7.61, P =. 043) and this variable was additionally associated with a greater likelihood of transition to psychosis (OR = 5.34, P =. 029). Conclusions: In CHR individuals, a tendency to hear speech in noise, and uncertainty about the affective valence of this speech, is associated with adverse outcomes. This task could be used in a battery of cognitive markers to stratify CHR participants according to subsequent outcomes.
KW - remission
KW - signal-detection
KW - transition
KW - uncertainty
KW - white noise task
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150396772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbac163
DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbac163
M3 - Article
C2 - 36516396
AN - SCOPUS:85150396772
SN - 0586-7614
VL - 49
SP - 339
EP - 349
JO - Schizophrenia bulletin
JF - Schizophrenia bulletin
IS - 2
ER -