2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this chapter we focus on social value in health-related research involving humans, including data driven research. We find that to state a requirement for social value is one thing; to actually evaluate the social value of a research project in a Research Ethics Committees (REC) is another. We therefore elaborate on how the requirement of social value can be applied. We argue, first, that it is important to have this requirement as a separate condition. To increase systematisation, we further discuss how social value can be assessed in the steps that together constitute the risk-benefit task of RECs. We argue that the addition of the requirement of social value can be seen as a consequence of a change in the sociology of science. It illustrates the move away from a science-internal understanding of scientific validity into an inclusive understanding of social value. Accepting social value as a requirement for research to be evaluated by a REC means that social value has matured from an attractive but illusive idea into something that has to be assessed, evaluated and optimised and can be used to address some of the justice issues in healthcare.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of Health Research Regulation
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter4
Pages46-55
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781108620024
ISBN (Print)9781108475976
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • research ethics
  • research ethics committees
  • risk/benefit ratio
  • social value
  • sociology of science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this