Single versus triple daily activation of the distractor: no significant effects of frequency of distraction on bone regenerate quantity and architecture

  • Urville Mardijanto Djasim
  • , Eppo Bonne Wolvius
  • , Johan Wilhelm Van Neck
  • , Annemieke Van Wamel
  • , Harrie Weinans
  • , Karel George Hendrik Van Der Wal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of two different frequencies of distraction on the quantity and architecture of bone regenerate using micro-computed tomography, and to determine whether radiographic and ultrasonographic bone-fill scores provide reliable predictive value for the amount of new bone in the distraction area.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six skeletally mature rabbits underwent three full days of latency, after which midface distraction was started. Low-frequency group (n=12): a distraction rate of 0.9 mm/d achieved by one daily activation for 11 days to create a 10mm distraction gap. High-frequency group (n=12): idem, but three daily activations were used instead of one. Control group (n=2) underwent no distraction. After 21 days of consolidation, bone-fill in the distraction area was assessed by means of ultrasonography and radiography. Micro-computed tomography was used to quantify new bone formation and bone architecture.

RESULTS: Relative bone volume (BV/TV) showed a tendency towards a difference (P=0.09) between the low and high-frequency groups. No significant differences were found for bone architecture. No significant correlation between BV/TV values and bone-fill scores was found.

CONCLUSIONS: An increase in rhythm from one to three activations daily does not create significantly more bone. Bone-fill score values provided no reliable predictive value for the amount of new bone formation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-151
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Animals
  • Bone Density/physiology
  • Bone Regeneration/physiology
  • External Fixators
  • Female
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Models, Animal
  • Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging
  • Osteogenesis/physiology
  • Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Rabbits
  • Random Allocation
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Single versus triple daily activation of the distractor: no significant effects of frequency of distraction on bone regenerate quantity and architecture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this