Should non-inferiority drug trials be banned altogether?

Translated title of the contribution: Should non-inferiority drug trials be banned altogether?
  • G. Wangge
  • , O.H. Klungel
  • , C.B. Roes
  • , A. de Boer
  • , A.W. Hoes
  • , M.J. Knol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Non-inferiority (NI) trials can be used in a situation when a new drug is expected to have a similar efficacy to its comparator but can offer other advantages over the existing drug, such as a more convenient method of administration or fewer side effects. Here, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of NI trials from an ethical, methodological and regulatory perspective. We suggest that such trials should be designed to address simultaneously the objective of showing NI with regard to drug efficacy and the objective of establishing superiority of the additional advantages of a drug over its active comparator.
Translated title of the contributionShould non-inferiority drug trials be banned altogether?
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)601-604
Number of pages4
JournalDrug Discovery Today
Volume18
Issue number11-12
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Econometric and Statistical Methods: General
  • Geneeskunde (GENK)
  • Geneeskunde(GENK)
  • Medical sciences
  • Bescherming en bevordering van de menselijke gezondheid

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should non-inferiority drug trials be banned altogether?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this