TY - GEN
T1 - Sequential reading effects in Dutch screening mammography
AU - Abbey, Craig K.
AU - Webster, Michael A.
AU - Geertse, Tanya
AU - Van Der Waal, Danielle
AU - Tetteroo, Eric
AU - Pijnappel, Ruud
AU - Broeders, Mireille J.M.
AU - Sechopoulos, Ioannis
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to all the screening radiologists and screening organizations (Foundation of Population Screening East, Foundation of Population Screening South and Foundation of Population Screening South-West) that participated in the ROCS study. This work was supported in part by the NIH through a research grant EY-010834 (MW). The content of this proceedings paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the institutional views of the funding agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 SPIE.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Radiologists reading screening mammograms often do this in batches of images read sequentially. This work investigates ways that readers change over the course of a batch. We evaluate sequential reading effects in terms of suspicion scores and reading times from an ongoing study in the Netherlands. A set of 3510 screening cases read as part of a national screening program by 10 qualified radiologist readers forms the basis for our study. The readers give a suspicion score (on a standalone device) in addition to their standard screening report. The score is time-stamped so that reading order and batch grouping can be assessed. Batches are defined as groups of cases with less than 10 minutes (600 s) between sequential readings. We use Kendall's Tau, weighted by batch size, as a measure of association between batch position, and suspicion score or reading time. Randomization is used to get confidence intervals on the null hypothesis (τ=0). We find significant associations between batch position and both of the variables under investigation (suspicion scores and reading time). The associations are negative, suggesting that both suspicion and reading time are reduced at later points in a batch. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that readers are becoming visually adapted to the properties of the images as they progress through a batch of cases, affecting their perception and decisions about the images.
AB - Radiologists reading screening mammograms often do this in batches of images read sequentially. This work investigates ways that readers change over the course of a batch. We evaluate sequential reading effects in terms of suspicion scores and reading times from an ongoing study in the Netherlands. A set of 3510 screening cases read as part of a national screening program by 10 qualified radiologist readers forms the basis for our study. The readers give a suspicion score (on a standalone device) in addition to their standard screening report. The score is time-stamped so that reading order and batch grouping can be assessed. Batches are defined as groups of cases with less than 10 minutes (600 s) between sequential readings. We use Kendall's Tau, weighted by batch size, as a measure of association between batch position, and suspicion score or reading time. Randomization is used to get confidence intervals on the null hypothesis (τ=0). We find significant associations between batch position and both of the variables under investigation (suspicion scores and reading time). The associations are negative, suggesting that both suspicion and reading time are reduced at later points in a batch. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that readers are becoming visually adapted to the properties of the images as they progress through a batch of cases, affecting their perception and decisions about the images.
KW - Batch reading
KW - Screening mammography
KW - Sequential effects
KW - Visual adaptation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085256902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.2549320
DO - 10.1117/12.2549320
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85085256902
T3 - Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
BT - Medical Imaging 2020
A2 - Samuelson, Frank W.
A2 - Taylor-Phillips, Sian
PB - SPIE
T2 - Medical Imaging 2020: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Y2 - 19 February 2020 through 20 February 2020
ER -