Sequential reading effects in Dutch screening mammography

Craig K. Abbey, Michael A. Webster, Tanya Geertse, Danielle Van Der Waal, Eric Tetteroo, Ruud Pijnappel, Mireille J.M. Broeders, Ioannis Sechopoulos

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Radiologists reading screening mammograms often do this in batches of images read sequentially. This work investigates ways that readers change over the course of a batch. We evaluate sequential reading effects in terms of suspicion scores and reading times from an ongoing study in the Netherlands. A set of 3510 screening cases read as part of a national screening program by 10 qualified radiologist readers forms the basis for our study. The readers give a suspicion score (on a standalone device) in addition to their standard screening report. The score is time-stamped so that reading order and batch grouping can be assessed. Batches are defined as groups of cases with less than 10 minutes (600 s) between sequential readings. We use Kendall's Tau, weighted by batch size, as a measure of association between batch position, and suspicion score or reading time. Randomization is used to get confidence intervals on the null hypothesis (τ=0). We find significant associations between batch position and both of the variables under investigation (suspicion scores and reading time). The associations are negative, suggesting that both suspicion and reading time are reduced at later points in a batch. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that readers are becoming visually adapted to the properties of the images as they progress through a batch of cases, affecting their perception and decisions about the images.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedical Imaging 2020
Subtitle of host publicationImage Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
EditorsFrank W. Samuelson, Sian Taylor-Phillips
PublisherSPIE
ISBN (Electronic)9781510633995
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
EventMedical Imaging 2020: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment - Houston, United States
Duration: 19 Feb 202020 Feb 2020

Publication series

NameProgress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
Volume11316
ISSN (Print)1605-7422

Conference

ConferenceMedical Imaging 2020: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityHouston
Period19/02/2020/02/20

Keywords

  • Batch reading
  • Screening mammography
  • Sequential effects
  • Visual adaptation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sequential reading effects in Dutch screening mammography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this