Semi-automated quantitative intravoxel incoherent motion analysis and its implementation in breast diffusion-weighted imaging

BACKGROUND: To optimize and validate intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) modeled diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for semi-automated analysis of breast lesions using a multi-reader setup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 176) with breast lesions (≥1 cm) and known pathology were prospectively examined (1.5 Tesla) with DWI (b = 0, 50, 200, 500, 800, 1000 s/mm(2) ) between November 2008 and July 2014 and grouped into a training and test set. Three independent readers applied a semi-automated procedure for setting regions-of-interest for each lesion and recorded ADC and IVIM parameters: molecular diffusion (Dslow ), microperfusion (Dfast ), and the fraction of Dfast (ffast ). In the training set (24 lesions, 12 benign), a semi-automated method was optimized to yield maximum true negatives (TN) with minimal false negatives (FN): only the optimal fraction (Fo) of voxels in the lesions was used and optimal thresholds were determined. The optimal Fo and thresholds were then applied to a consecutive test set (139 lesions, 23 benign) to obtain specificity and sensitivity.

RESULTS: In the training set, optimal thresholds were 1.44 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s (Dslow ), 18.55 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s (Dfast ), 0.247 (ffast ) and 2.00 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s (ADC) with Fo set to 0.61, 0.85, 1.0, and 1.0, respectively, this resulted in TN = 5 (IVIM) and TN = 1 (ADC), with FN = 0. In the test set, sensitivity and specificity among the readers were 90.5-93.1% and 43.5-52.2%, respectively, for IVIM, and 94.8-95.7% and 13.0-21.7% for ADC (P ≤ 0.0034) without inter-reader differences (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION: The presented semi-automated method for breast lesion evaluation is reader independent and yields significantly higher specificity for IVIM compared with the ADC.