TY - JOUR
T1 - Semantic priming effects in normal versus poor readers
AU - Assink, Egbert M.H.
AU - Van Bergen, Floor
AU - Van Teeseling, Heleen
AU - Knuijt, Paul P.N.A.
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - The authors studied sensitivity to semantic priming, as distinct from semantic judgment, in poor readers. Association strength (high vs. low semantic association) was manipulated factorially with semantic association type (categoric vs. thematic association). Participants were 11-year-old poor readers (n = 15) who were matched with a group of chronological-age controls (n = 13), and also matched with a group of reading-age controls (n = 15). Three priming conditions were used: related, unrelated, and neutral prime. Neutral primes consisted of a row of hash marks. Related primes elicited shorter decision latencies than did unrelated primes. Neutral primes elicited the slowest responses in all groups. Poor readers showed an additional delay in the neutral prime condition. No effects of association type (categorical vs. thematic) or association strength (high vs. low) were found, nor were any relationship with reading ability found. The delayed performance of the poor readers on neutral primes is explained in terms of orthographic processing and dependency on grapheme-phoneme relationships. The findings are discussed with reference to F. R. Vellutino, D. M. Scanlon, and D. Spearing’s (1995) work on semantic processing and reading ability.
AB - The authors studied sensitivity to semantic priming, as distinct from semantic judgment, in poor readers. Association strength (high vs. low semantic association) was manipulated factorially with semantic association type (categoric vs. thematic association). Participants were 11-year-old poor readers (n = 15) who were matched with a group of chronological-age controls (n = 13), and also matched with a group of reading-age controls (n = 15). Three priming conditions were used: related, unrelated, and neutral prime. Neutral primes consisted of a row of hash marks. Related primes elicited shorter decision latencies than did unrelated primes. Neutral primes elicited the slowest responses in all groups. Poor readers showed an additional delay in the neutral prime condition. No effects of association type (categorical vs. thematic) or association strength (high vs. low) were found, nor were any relationship with reading ability found. The delayed performance of the poor readers on neutral primes is explained in terms of orthographic processing and dependency on grapheme-phoneme relationships. The findings are discussed with reference to F. R. Vellutino, D. M. Scanlon, and D. Spearing’s (1995) work on semantic processing and reading ability.
KW - Poor readers
KW - Reading ability
KW - Semantic priming
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2042507689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3200/GNTP.165.1.67-80
DO - 10.3200/GNTP.165.1.67-80
M3 - Article
C2 - 15101552
AN - SCOPUS:2042507689
SN - 0022-1325
VL - 165
SP - 67
EP - 80
JO - Journal of Genetic Psychology
JF - Journal of Genetic Psychology
IS - 1
ER -