Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community

  • Joep J.J.M. Stohr*
  • , Vivian F. Zwart
  • , Gabriel Goderski
  • , Adam Meijer
  • , Carla R.S. Nagel-Imming
  • , Marjolein F.Q. Kluytmans-van den Bergh
  • , Suzan D. Pas
  • , Femke van den Oetelaar
  • , Marloes Hellwich
  • , Kim H. Gan
  • , Ariene Rietveld
  • , Jaco J. Verweij
  • , Jean Luc Murk
  • , Wouter van den Bijllaardt
  • , Jan A.J.W. Kluytmans
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of nasal mid-turbinate self-testing using rapid antigen detection tests (RDT) for persons with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the community. Self-testing for COVID-19 infection with lateral flow assay severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RDT, provides rapid results and could enable frequent and extensive testing in the community, thereby improving the control of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Participants visiting a municipal SARS-CoV-2 testing centre, received self-testing kits containing either the BD Veritor System (BD-RDT) or Roche SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test (Roche-RDT). Oro-nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from the participants for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) testing. As a proxy for contagiousness, viral culture was performed on a selection of qRT-PCR positive samples to determine the Ct-value at which the chance of a positive culture dropped below 0.5 (Ct-value cut-off). Sensitivity and specificity of self-testing were compared to qRT-PCR with a Ct-value below the Ct value cut-off. Determinants independently associated with a false-negative self-test result were determined. Results: A total of 3201 participants were included (BD-RDT n = 1595; Roche-RDT n = 1606). Sensitivity and specificity of self-testing compared with the qRT-PCR results with a Ct-value below the Ct-value cut-off were 78.4% (95% CI 73.2%–83.5%) and 99.4% (95% CI 99.1%–99.7%), respectively. A higher age was independently associated with a false-negative self-testing result with an odds ratio of 1.024 (95% CI 1.003–1.044). Conclusions: Self-testing using currently available RDT has a high specificity and relatively high sensitivity to identify individuals with a high probability of contagiousness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)695-700
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume28
Issue number5
Early online date4 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • Antigens, Viral/analysis
  • COVID-19 Testing
  • COVID-19/diagnosis
  • Humans
  • SARS-CoV-2/genetics
  • Self-Testing
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this