TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-management interventions
T2 - Proposal and validation of a new operational definition
AU - Jonkman, Nini H
AU - Schuurmans, Marieke J
AU - Jaarsma, Tiny
AU - Shortridge-Baggett, Lillie M
AU - Hoes, Arno W
AU - Trappenburg, Jaap C A
N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews on complex interventions like self-management interventions often do not explicitly state an operational definition of the intervention studied, which may impact the review's conclusions. This study aimed to propose an operational definition of self-management interventions and determine its discriminative performance compared to other operational definitions.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of definitions of 'self-management interventions' and consensus meetings with self-management research experts and practitioners.RESULTS: Self-management interventions were defined as "interventions that aim to equip patients with skills to actively participate and take responsibility in the management of their chronic condition in order to function optimally through at least knowledge acquisition and a combination of at least two of the following: stimulation of independent sign/symptom monitoring, medication management, enhancing problem-solving and decision-making skills for medical treatment management, and changing their physical activity, dietary and/or smoking behaviour." This definition substantially reduced the number of selected studies (255/750). In two preliminary expert meetings (n=6), the proposed definition was identifiable for self-management research experts and practitioners (resp. 80% and 60% agreement).CONCLUSION: Future systematic reviews must carefully consider the operational definition of the intervention studied, since the definition influences the selection of studies upon which conclusions and recommendations for clinical practice are based.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews on complex interventions like self-management interventions often do not explicitly state an operational definition of the intervention studied, which may impact the review's conclusions. This study aimed to propose an operational definition of self-management interventions and determine its discriminative performance compared to other operational definitions.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of definitions of 'self-management interventions' and consensus meetings with self-management research experts and practitioners.RESULTS: Self-management interventions were defined as "interventions that aim to equip patients with skills to actively participate and take responsibility in the management of their chronic condition in order to function optimally through at least knowledge acquisition and a combination of at least two of the following: stimulation of independent sign/symptom monitoring, medication management, enhancing problem-solving and decision-making skills for medical treatment management, and changing their physical activity, dietary and/or smoking behaviour." This definition substantially reduced the number of selected studies (255/750). In two preliminary expert meetings (n=6), the proposed definition was identifiable for self-management research experts and practitioners (resp. 80% and 60% agreement).CONCLUSION: Future systematic reviews must carefully consider the operational definition of the intervention studied, since the definition influences the selection of studies upon which conclusions and recommendations for clinical practice are based.
KW - Chronic disease
KW - Complex interventions
KW - Definition
KW - Primary care
KW - Self-management interventions
KW - Systematic review
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 27531245
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 80
SP - 34
EP - 42
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
ER -