TY - JOUR
T1 - Selecting and Preparing Clinical Sites for the Successful Conduct of Decentralized Clinical Trial Activities-Findings From the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial
AU - Lipinska, Katarzyna
AU - van Weelij, Danny
AU - Lagerwaard, Bart
AU - Rutgrink, Linda
AU - Vardianu, Eduard
AU - Naster, Petra
AU - Pérez-Breva, Lina
AU - Bodfish, Paul
AU - Heath, Megan
AU - van Rijswick, Yvonne
AU - Grobbee, Diederick E
AU - Zuidgeest, Mira G P
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) offer opportunities to improve trial accessibility, participant convenience, and efficiency, yet may pose significant operational challenges for clinical trial sites. This paper presents the operational insights gained from selecting, training, and supporting clinical sites within the RADIAL proof-of-concept trial, part of the Trials@Home project. RADIAL was a multicenter, low-intervention phase IV trial comparing conventional, hybrid, and fully decentralized approaches for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus across six European countries. Site selection involved detailed feasibility assessments evaluating operational capabilities, recruitment potential, technological readiness, and willingness to implement decentralized elements. Despite proactive training, including ongoing support via a centralized helpdesk, sites faced initial difficulties with technology management and participant onboarding. Contractual complexities were prominent, particularly regarding clearly delineating responsibilities and data handling in agreements involving third-party providers. Moreover, integrating third-party services necessitated meticulous oversight strategies and continuous stakeholder coordination to ensure regulatory compliance and efficient trial management. Our experiences underscore essential considerations for future DCT implementations: proactive stakeholder alignment; tailored, timely, and ongoing training and support; intuitive technology design informed by clinical user input; robust, centralized oversight structures; and clearly defined delegation frameworks for third-party engagements. Addressing these operational considerations will facilitate smoother transitions toward decentralized clinical research models, maximizing their potential benefits while managing associated complexities effectively-especially for clinical site staff.
AB - Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) offer opportunities to improve trial accessibility, participant convenience, and efficiency, yet may pose significant operational challenges for clinical trial sites. This paper presents the operational insights gained from selecting, training, and supporting clinical sites within the RADIAL proof-of-concept trial, part of the Trials@Home project. RADIAL was a multicenter, low-intervention phase IV trial comparing conventional, hybrid, and fully decentralized approaches for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus across six European countries. Site selection involved detailed feasibility assessments evaluating operational capabilities, recruitment potential, technological readiness, and willingness to implement decentralized elements. Despite proactive training, including ongoing support via a centralized helpdesk, sites faced initial difficulties with technology management and participant onboarding. Contractual complexities were prominent, particularly regarding clearly delineating responsibilities and data handling in agreements involving third-party providers. Moreover, integrating third-party services necessitated meticulous oversight strategies and continuous stakeholder coordination to ensure regulatory compliance and efficient trial management. Our experiences underscore essential considerations for future DCT implementations: proactive stakeholder alignment; tailored, timely, and ongoing training and support; intuitive technology design informed by clinical user input; robust, centralized oversight structures; and clearly defined delegation frameworks for third-party engagements. Addressing these operational considerations will facilitate smoother transitions toward decentralized clinical research models, maximizing their potential benefits while managing associated complexities effectively-especially for clinical site staff.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018456249
U2 - 10.1002/cpt.70075
DO - 10.1002/cpt.70075
M3 - Article
C2 - 41035203
SN - 0009-9236
VL - 118
SP - 1057
EP - 1066
JO - Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
JF - Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
IS - 5
M1 - doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70075
ER -