TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening Tool Improves Recognition of Movement Disorders by Internists and Paediatricians in Patients With Inherited Metabolic Diseases
AU - Hulshof, Ellen M.
AU - Lantinga, Hugo P.
AU - Alkemade, Gonnie
AU - Bosch, Annet M.
AU - Brands, Marion M.
AU - Vliet, Danique Draaisma van
AU - Haijer-Schreuder, Andrea B.
AU - Hoytema van Konijnenburg, Eva M.M.
AU - Janssen, Mirian C.H.
AU - van der Klauw, Melanie M.
AU - Langeveld, Mirjam
AU - Lubout, Charlotte M.A.
AU - van Ockenburg, Sonja L.
AU - Oussoren, Esmeralda
AU - Panis, Bianca
AU - Sjouke, Barbara
AU - de Vries, Maaike
AU - Wagenmakers, Margreet A.E.M.
AU - Wijnen, Mark
AU - Sival, Deborah A.
AU - Tijssen, Marina A.J.
AU - de Koning, Tom J.
AU - Koens, Lisette H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of SSIEM.
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Movement disorders are common in inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and significantly impact quality of life. Unfortunately, they are often underrecognised by metabolic physicians. This study investigated whether a new screening tool improves recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients by non-neurologists. Internists and paediatricians specialized in IMDs assessed videos of 44 IMD patients who perform four specific neurological tests, to evaluate the presence and phenotype of a movement disorder. Initially, baseline assessments were performed without the tool. Eight months later, the same videos were assessed using an instructional video demonstrating the four neurological tests, and a screening tool including these tests with 14 yes/no questions regarding observed abnormalities. One hundred and forty-nine assessments were conducted by 15 metabolic internists and paediatricians. At baseline, 70% (105/149) of assessments correctly determined the presence of a movement disorder. Sensitivity of the tool was 68%. In the second measurement, when the outcome of the tool was considered decisive (with at least one positive answer indicating a movement disorder), 79% (117/149) of assessments were correct. Sensitivity of the tool increased to 87% (Chi-square = 15.75, p < 0.001). All severe and moderately severe movement disorders were recognized in the second measurement. The tool and instructional video did not enhance recognition of specific movement disorder phenotypes. However, the tool did improve the accuracy of treatment indications (chi-square = 4.000, p < 0.05). The correct use of the screening tool significantly increased the sensitivity and thereby the recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients, though referral to a neurologist remains necessary for phenotype identification.
AB - Movement disorders are common in inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and significantly impact quality of life. Unfortunately, they are often underrecognised by metabolic physicians. This study investigated whether a new screening tool improves recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients by non-neurologists. Internists and paediatricians specialized in IMDs assessed videos of 44 IMD patients who perform four specific neurological tests, to evaluate the presence and phenotype of a movement disorder. Initially, baseline assessments were performed without the tool. Eight months later, the same videos were assessed using an instructional video demonstrating the four neurological tests, and a screening tool including these tests with 14 yes/no questions regarding observed abnormalities. One hundred and forty-nine assessments were conducted by 15 metabolic internists and paediatricians. At baseline, 70% (105/149) of assessments correctly determined the presence of a movement disorder. Sensitivity of the tool was 68%. In the second measurement, when the outcome of the tool was considered decisive (with at least one positive answer indicating a movement disorder), 79% (117/149) of assessments were correct. Sensitivity of the tool increased to 87% (Chi-square = 15.75, p < 0.001). All severe and moderately severe movement disorders were recognized in the second measurement. The tool and instructional video did not enhance recognition of specific movement disorder phenotypes. However, the tool did improve the accuracy of treatment indications (chi-square = 4.000, p < 0.05). The correct use of the screening tool significantly increased the sensitivity and thereby the recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients, though referral to a neurologist remains necessary for phenotype identification.
KW - adults
KW - inherited metabolic diseases
KW - movement disorders
KW - screening tool
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021200463
U2 - 10.1002/jimd.70105
DO - 10.1002/jimd.70105
M3 - Article
C2 - 41208362
AN - SCOPUS:105021200463
SN - 0141-8955
VL - 48
JO - Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
JF - Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
IS - 6
M1 - e70105
ER -