TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and Efficacy of 166Ho Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
T2 - The HEPAR Primary Study
AU - Reinders, Margot T.M.
AU - van Erpecum, Karel J.
AU - Smits, Maarten L.J.
AU - Braat, Arthur J.A.T.
AU - Bruijne, Joep de
AU - Bruijnen, Rutger
AU - Sprengers, Dave
AU - Man, Robert A.de
AU - Vegt, Erik
AU - IJzermans, Jan N.M.
AU - Moelker, Adriaan
AU - Lam, Marnix G.E.H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was financed mainly by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding, project 10307) and was financially supported by the Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department of the University Medical Center Utrecht. Quirem Medical B.V. supplied the holmium microspheres free of charge. Margot Reinders acted as a speaker for Boston Scientific/BTG (personal fees) and was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kanker-bestrijding) via a grant received by Marnix Lam. Karel van Erpe-cum was on the advisory board of AOP Orphan Farmaceuticals AG in 2020 and is a member of HepNed and Hepatitis C Elimination in The Netherlands (CELINE—a cooperation between university medical centers in The Netherlands for elimination of hepatitis C viral infection from The Netherlands, sponsored by Gilead). Maar-ten Smits acted as a speaker for Boston Scientific/BTG (personal fees and nonfinancial support). Arthur Braat acted as a speaker for Boston Scientific/BTG (personal fees and nonfinancial support) and Terumo (nonfinancial support). Marnix Lam acted as a speaker for Boston Scientific/BTG (personal fees and nonfinancial support) and Terumo (nonfinancial support) and received a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Funding Information:
We thank the patients for participating in this study; the independent radiologists Manon N.G.J.A. Braat and Frank J. Wessels for reviewing all the patient images; the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine of the University Medical Centre Utrecht for cofunding this study; Tjitske Kent-Bosma (clinical research coordinator, University Medical Centre Utrecht) for contributing to study coordination; and the gastroenterology departments of both the University Medical Centre Utrecht and Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam for recruiting patients.
Publisher Copyright:
COPYRIGHT © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - The safety and efficacy of
166Ho radioembolization was first determined in the HEPAR and HEPAR II studies, which, however, excluded patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this prospective clinical early phase II study was to establish the toxicity profile of
166Ho radioembolization in patients with measurable, liver-dominant HCC; Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage B or C; a Child–Pugh score of no more than B7; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 without curative treatment options. Methods: The primary endpoint was a rate of unacceptable toxicity defined as grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia (Common Terminology Cancer Adverse Events, version 4.03) in combination with a low albumin or ascites level in the absence of disease progression or treatment-related serious adverse events. Secondary endpoints included overall toxicity, response, survival, change in α-fetoprotein, and quality of life. Thirty-one patients with Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage B (71%) or C (29%) HCC were included, mostly multifocal (87%) or bilobar (55%) disease. Results: Common grade 1 or 2 clinical toxicity included fatigue (71%), back pain (55%), ascites (32%), dyspnea (23%), nausea (23%), and abdominal pain (23%), with no more than 10% grade 3–5 toxicity. Grade 3 laboratory toxicity (>10%) included an aspartate transaminase and g-glutamyltransferase increase (16%), hyperglycemia (19%), and lymphopenia (29%). Treatment-related unacceptable toxicity occurred in 3 of 31 patients. At 3 mo, 54% of target lesions showed a complete or partial response according to modified RECIST. Median overall survival was 14.9 mo (95% CI, 10.4–24.9 mo). No significant changes in quality of life or pain were observed. Conclusion: The safety of
166Ho radioembolization was confirmed in HCC, with less than 10% unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy data support further evaluation.
AB - The safety and efficacy of
166Ho radioembolization was first determined in the HEPAR and HEPAR II studies, which, however, excluded patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this prospective clinical early phase II study was to establish the toxicity profile of
166Ho radioembolization in patients with measurable, liver-dominant HCC; Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage B or C; a Child–Pugh score of no more than B7; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 without curative treatment options. Methods: The primary endpoint was a rate of unacceptable toxicity defined as grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia (Common Terminology Cancer Adverse Events, version 4.03) in combination with a low albumin or ascites level in the absence of disease progression or treatment-related serious adverse events. Secondary endpoints included overall toxicity, response, survival, change in α-fetoprotein, and quality of life. Thirty-one patients with Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage B (71%) or C (29%) HCC were included, mostly multifocal (87%) or bilobar (55%) disease. Results: Common grade 1 or 2 clinical toxicity included fatigue (71%), back pain (55%), ascites (32%), dyspnea (23%), nausea (23%), and abdominal pain (23%), with no more than 10% grade 3–5 toxicity. Grade 3 laboratory toxicity (>10%) included an aspartate transaminase and g-glutamyltransferase increase (16%), hyperglycemia (19%), and lymphopenia (29%). Treatment-related unacceptable toxicity occurred in 3 of 31 patients. At 3 mo, 54% of target lesions showed a complete or partial response according to modified RECIST. Median overall survival was 14.9 mo (95% CI, 10.4–24.9 mo). No significant changes in quality of life or pain were observed. Conclusion: The safety of
166Ho radioembolization was confirmed in HCC, with less than 10% unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy data support further evaluation.
KW - hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - holmium
KW - locoregional treatment
KW - oncology
KW - radioembolization
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology
KW - Humans
KW - Ascites/etiology
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects
KW - Microspheres
KW - Liver Neoplasms/pathology
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Yttrium Radioisotopes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85134295868
U2 - 10.2967/jnumed.122.263823
DO - 10.2967/jnumed.122.263823
M3 - Article
C2 - 35589409
AN - SCOPUS:85134295868
SN - 1535-5667
VL - 63
SP - 1891
EP - 1898
JO - Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
IS - 12
ER -