Abstract
Robotic surgery in urology has become a reality in the year 2007 with several thousand robotic prostatectomies having been performed already worldwide. Compared to conventional laparoscopy, the process of learning the robotic technique is short and the operative results are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopy or even open surgery. However, tfiere are still some disadvantages with the robotic systems, mainly technical (tactile feedback) and financial (investment and running costs). Alternative and more inexpensive technologies must be considered in order to overcome the difficulties of conventional laparoscopy (instrument handling, degrees of freedom, 3-D vision), while also integrating advantages of the robotic systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 179-189 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2007 |
Keywords
- Laparoscopy
- Prostatic neoplasms
- Robotic surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Robotics and telemanipulation: Update and perspectives in urology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver