Risk Prediction Models of Natural Menopause Onset: A Systematic Review

Hamidreza Raeisi-Dehkordi, Stefanie Kummer, Peter Francis Raguindin, Gordana Dejanovic, Petek Eylul Taneri, Isabel Cardona, Lum Kastrati, Beatrice Minder, Trudy Voortman, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Klodian Dhana, Marija Glisic, Taulant Muka*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Predicting the onset of menopause is important for family planning and to ensure prompt intervention in women at risk of developing menopause-related diseases. Objective: We aimed to summarize risk prediction models of natural menopause onset and their performance. Methods: Five bibliographic databases were searched up to March 2022. We included prospective studies on perimenopausal women or women in menopausal transition that reported either a univariable or multivariable model for risk prediction of natural menopause onset. Two authors independently extracted data according to the CHARMS (critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies) checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using a prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). Results: Of 8132 references identified, we included 14 articles based on 8 unique studies comprising 9588 women (mainly Caucasian) and 3289 natural menopause events. All included studies used onset of natural menopause (ONM) as outcome, while 4 studies also predicted early ONM. Overall, there were 180 risk prediction models investigated, with age, anti-Müllerian hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone being the most investigated predictors. Estimated C-statistic for the prediction models ranged from 0.62 to 0.95. Although all studies were rated at high risk of bias mainly due to the methodological concerns related to the statistical analysis, their applicability was satisfactory. Conclusion: Predictive performance and generalizability of current prediction models on ONM is limited given that these models were generated from studies at high risk of bias and from specific populations/ethnicities. Although in certain settings such models may be useful, efforts to improve their performance are needed as use becomes more widespread.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2934-2944
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume107
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • onset of menopause
  • perimenopause
  • premenopausal women
  • risk prediction model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Prediction Models of Natural Menopause Onset: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this