Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk Factors for the Development of Neurological Deficits in Metastatic Spinal Disease: An International, Multicenter Delphi Study

  • Eline H. Huele
  • , Roxanne Gal
  • , Wietse S.C. Eppinga
  • , Helena M. Verkooijen
  • , John E. O’Toole
  • , Ilya Laufer
  • , Daniel M. Sciubba
  • , Cordula Netzer
  • , Wouter Foppen
  • , Arjun Sahgal
  • , Michael G. Fehlings
  • , Sheng fu L. Lo
  • , Charles G. Fisher
  • , Laurence D. Rhines
  • , Jeremy J. Reynolds
  • , Aron Lazary
  • , Alessandro Gasbarrini
  • , Nicolas Dea
  • , Michael H. Weber
  • , Jorrit Jan Verlaan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Study Design: Delphi study Objective: The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. Methods: A three-round Delphi study was conducted between January-May 2023 including AO Spine members, comprising mainly neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. In round 1, participants listed radiological factors, patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, previous cancer-related treatment factors and additional factors. In round 2, participants ranked the factors on importance per category and selected a top 9 from all factors. Kendall’s W coefficient of concordance was calculated as a measure of consensus. In the final round, participants provided feedback on the rankings resulting from round 2. Lastly, the highest-ranking factors were more clearly defined and operationalized by an expert panel. Results: Over two hundred physicians and researchers participated in each round. The factors listed in the first round were collapsed into 12 radiological factors, 14 patient characteristics, 6 tumor characteristics and 12 previous cancer-related treatment factors. High agreement was found in round 3 on the top-half lists in each category and the overall top 9, originating from round 2. Kendall’s W indicated strong agreement between the participants. ‘Epidural spinal cord compression’, ‘aggressive tumor behavior’ and ‘mechanical instability’ were deemed most influential for the development of neurological deficits. Conclusion: This study provides factors that may be related to the development and/or progression of neurological deficits in patients with metastatic spinal disease. This list can serve as a basis for future directions in prognostication research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93S-103S
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Keywords

  • delphi
  • metastatic spinal disease
  • neurological deficits
  • risk factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Factors for the Development of Neurological Deficits in Metastatic Spinal Disease: An International, Multicenter Delphi Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this