Risk Factors for Infections Involving Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices

David H Birnie, Jia Wang, Marco Alings, François Philippon, Ratika Parkash, Jaimie Manlucu, Paul Angaran, Claus Rinne, Benoit Coutu, R Aaron Low, Vidal Essebag, Carlos Morillo, Damian Redfearn, Satish Toal, Giuliano Becker, Michel Degrâce, Bernard Thibault, Eugene Crystal, Stanley Tung, John LeMaitreOmar Sultan, Matthew Bennett, Jamil Bashir, Felix Ayala-Paredes, Philippe Gervais, Leon Rioux, Martin E W Hemels, Leon H R Bouwels, Derek V Exner, Paul Dorian, Stuart J Connolly, Yves Longtin, Andrew D Krahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device infection is a major complication that usually requires device removal. PADIT (Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial) was a large cluster crossover trial of conventional versus incremental antibiotics.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate independent predictors of device infection in PADIT and develop a novel infection risk score.

METHODS: In brief, over 4 6-month periods, 28 centers used either conventional or incremental prophylactic antibiotic treatment in all patients. The primary outcome was hospitalization for device infection within 1 year (blinded endpoint adjudication). Multivariable logistic prediction modeling was used to identify the independent predictors and develop a risk score for device infection. The prediction models were internally validated with bootstrap methods.

RESULTS: Device procedures were performed in 19,603 patients, and hospitalization for infection occurred in 177 (0.90%) within 1 year of follow-up. The final prediction model identified 5 independent predictors of device infection (prior procedures [P], age [A], depressed renal function [D], immunocompromised [I], and procedure type [T]) with an optimism-corrected C-statistic of 0.704 (95% confidence interval: 0.660 to 0.744). A PADIT risk score ranging from 0 to 15 points classified patients into low (0 to 4), intermediate (5 to 6) and high (≥7) risk groups with rates of hospitalization for infection of 0.51%, 1.42%, and 3.41%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: This study identified 5 independent predictors of device infection and developed a novel infection risk score in the largest cardiac implantable electronic device trial to date, warranting validation in an independent cohort. The 5 independent predictors in the PADIT score are readily adopted into clinical practice. (Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial [PADIT Pilot]; NCT01002911).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2845-2854
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume74
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • antibiotics
  • cardiac implantable electronic device
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • infection
  • pacemaker
  • implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Factors for Infections Involving Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this