Reviewing Residents' Competence: A Qualitative Study of the Role of Clinical Competency Committees in Performance Assessment

Karen E. Hauer*, Benjamin Chesluk, William Iobst, Eric Holmboe, Robert B. Baron, Christy K. Boscardin, Olle ten Cate, Patricia S. O'Sullivan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose

Clinical competency committees (CCCs) are now required in graduate medical education. This study examined how residency programs understand and operationalize this mandate for resident performance review.

Method

In 2013, the investigators conducted semistructured interviews with 34 residency program directors at five public institutions in California, asking about each institution's CCCs and resident performance review processes. They used conventional content analysis to identify major themes from the verbatim interview transcripts.

Results

The purpose of resident performance review at all institutions was oriented toward one of two paradigms: a problem identification model, which predominated; or a developmental model. The problem identification model, which focused on identifying and addressing performance concerns, used performance data such as red-flag alerts and informal information shared with program directors to identify struggling residents.

In the developmental model, the timely acquisition and synthesis of data to inform each resident's developmental trajectory was challenging. Participants highly valued CCC members' expertise as educators to corroborate the identification of struggling residents and to enhance credibility of the committee's outcomes. Training in applying the milestones to the CCC's work was minimal.

Participants were highly committed to performance review and perceived the current process as adequate for struggling residents but potentially not for others.

Conclusions

Institutions orient resident performance review toward problem identification; a developmental approach is uncommon. Clarifying the purpose of resident performance review and employing efficient information systems that synthesize performance data and engage residents and faculty in purposeful feedback discussions could enable the meaningful implementation of milestones-based assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1084-1092
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume90
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

Keywords

  • MEDICAL-EDUCATION
  • LEARNER ASSESSMENT
  • MILESTONES
  • FACULTY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing Residents' Competence: A Qualitative Study of the Role of Clinical Competency Committees in Performance Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this