Reviewer's recommendations predict impact: why you have to send us your very best work.

Translated title of the contribution: Reviewer's recommendations predict impact: why you have to send us your very best work.

T. Op 't Hof, R. Coronel, M.J. Janse

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	Reviewer's recommendations predict impact: why you have to send us your very best work.
Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	1-3
Number of pages	3
Journal	Cardiovascular Research
Volume	48
Publication status	Published - 2000

Keywords

@article{2d12cd837c704717809ee06a2edcda42,

title = "Reviewer's recommendations predict impact: why you have to send us your very best work.",

keywords = "Econometric and Statistical Methods: General, Geneeskunde (GENK), Geneeskunde(GENK), Algemeen onderzoek, Other medical specialities",

author = "{Op 't Hof}, T. and R. Coronel and M.J. Janse",

year = "2000",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "48",

pages = "1--3",

journal = "Cardiovascular Research",

issn = "0008-6363",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reviewer's recommendations predict impact: why you have to send us your very best work.

AU - Op 't Hof, T.

AU - Coronel, R.

AU - Janse, M.J.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

KW - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General

KW - Geneeskunde (GENK)

KW - Geneeskunde(GENK)

KW - Algemeen onderzoek

KW - Other medical specialities

M3 - Article

SN - 0008-6363

VL - 48

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Cardiovascular Research

JF - Cardiovascular Research

ER -