Review on complications and adverse effects of metallic urinary stents

Duje Rako*, Petra de Graaf, Federico Soria

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Urinary stents, be it urethral or ureteral, polymeric, metallic or biodegradable, are one
of the most frequently used tools in urology and they have been used for decades in prophylactic and therapeutic setting. Although relatively low invasive, they are prone to complications and adverse effects so much that complication rates up to 100% have been described. Many reviews have focused either on specific groups of patients or particular stent types, materials or designs but so far, no comprehensive review on complications has been published. To tackle this issue, a working group was set up within ENIUS (European Network of multidisciplinary research to Improve Urinary Stents) tasked with literature search in order to screen for and systematically review published stent complications in urethra (male only) and ureters (polymeric and metallic ureteral stents in both sexes) when used in obstructed systems. In this paper, we review, catalogue and summarize complications published for metallic urethral and ureteral stents.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-122
Number of pages9
JournalActa Clinica Croatica
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Alloy
  • Complications
  • Metal
  • Metallic
  • Review
  • Stent
  • Ureteral
  • Ureteric
  • Urethral
  • Urinary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review on complications and adverse effects of metallic urinary stents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this