Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (OpcemISA) of the combination of ISA101b and cemiplimab versus cemiplimab for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HPV16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).

Background: ISA101b (peltopepimut-S) is a therapeutic vaccine targeting the HPV16 E6/E7 oncoproteins. The synthetic long peptides of ISA101b induce specific expansion of both CD4⁺ T-helper cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells against E6/7 oncogenes¹. Combination of cemiplimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody with ISA101b elicits a synergistic anti-tumor effect². Methods: First and second line anti-PD-1 naïve patients with confirmed HPV16+ R/M OPC were randomized to treatment with either ISA101b (subcutaneously 100µg/peptide on days 1, 29, and 50) or placebo, with cemiplimab (intravenously 350mg q/21 days) for up to 24 months or until disease progression or treatment withdrawal. The primary efficacy endpoint was ORR after ≥6 months of follow-up by independent review as per RECIST1.1. Data cut-off for this analysis was 5 July 2023. The primary safety endpoint was frequency and severity of AEs. Secondary endpoints included PFS and OS. For the latter 12-month survival data are shown. Combined Positive Score (CPS) analyses were planned subgroup analyses. A p-value <0.1 was defined as statistically significant. Predefined analysis sets are the full analysis set (FAS), i.e. all patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug, and the per protocol set (PPS) which includes patients with centrally confirmed HPV16-positivity who received all 3 doses of ISA101b/placebo, had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment and no major protocol deviations. Results: A total of 198 patients (mean age 62.8 ±9.6 years) received ≥1 dose of study drug: 173 (87.4%) male, and 25 (12.6%) female; 110 (55.6%) were treated in first, and 74 (37.4%) in second line. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. In the ISA101b arm, ORR was 25.3% compared to 22.9% in the control arm (NS, Table). SAEs occurred in 33.0% of patients in the ISA101b arm vs 31.6% in the control arm. Patients with a CPS ≥20 treated with cemiplimab and 3 doses of ISA101b had a significantly better ORR and OS compared to patients in the control arm (Table; mOS (95% CI) not reached (28.1, -) vs 23.3 (11.9, 30.1) months, P = 0.0232 (PPS)). Patients with CPS <20 had on average a shorter OS in the ISA101b arm. Conclusions: Whereas there was no advantage of the addition of ISA101b to cemiplimab regarding ORR on the overall population, in patients with CPS ≥20 ISA101b significantly improved the ORR. Median OS was better in patients with CPS ≥20 who completed a full course of ISA101b. In contrast, patients with lower CPS did not benefit. Toxicity was comparable between the 2 arms. Clinical trial information: NCT03669718. (Table presented.)