Resultaten van semencryopreservatie en gebruik voor kunstmatige voortplantingstechnieken bij 898 mannen met kanker: Semencryopreservatie bij mannen met kanker

I. Muller; R. J A Oude Ophuis; F. J M Broekmans; M. T W T Lock

doi:10.1007/s13629-015-0026-y

Resultaten van semencryopreservatie en gebruik voor kunstmatige voortplantingstechnieken bij 898 mannen met kanker: Semencryopreservatie bij mannen met kanker

Translated title of the contribution: Results of cryopreserved semen and its use for assisted reproduction technology in 898 men with cancer

I. Muller, R. J A Oude Ophuis, F. J M Broekmans, M. T W T Lock^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a non-academic center by a single surgeon in 94 cases Objective:: To determine how often cryopreserved semen from cancer patients is used and the success rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in this group. Design:: Retrospective data analysis. Setting:: Academic tertiary referral fertility centre. Patients:: 898 male cancer patients who cryopreserved semen between 1983-2013. Intervention:: Follow-up of all ART treatments. Main outcome measures:: Usage rate of cryopreserved semen and success rate of assisted reproductive technology in achieving parenthood. Results:: 898 patients cryobanked their semen. 96 patients used their cryopreserved semen for ART (10,7%). The clinical pregnancy rate for intra-uterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and cryo embryo transfer (ET) were 14%, 37%, 38% and 18%, respectively. A total of 77% of the couples achieved parenthood. Conclusions:: Although the success rates of ART are impressive, the usage rate of cryopreserved semen in cancer patients is (too) low.

Translated title of the contribution	Results of cryopreserved semen and its use for assisted reproduction technology in 898 men with cancer
Original language	Dutch
Pages (from-to)	120-126
Number of pages	7
Journal	Tijdschrift voor Urologie
Volume	5
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-015-0026-y
Publication status	Published - 28 Sept 2015

Keywords

cryopreservation
semen
cancer
assisted reproduction technology

Access to Document

10.1007/s13629-015-0026-y

Cite this

@article{d5afea5ae616411591bb22ce70fc2c6a,

title = "Resultaten van semencryopreservatie en gebruik voor kunstmatige voortplantingstechnieken bij 898 mannen met kanker: Semencryopreservatie bij mannen met kanker",

abstract = "Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a non-academic center by a single surgeon in 94 cases Objective:: To determine how often cryopreserved semen from cancer patients is used and the success rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in this group. Design:: Retrospective data analysis. Setting:: Academic tertiary referral fertility centre. Patients:: 898 male cancer patients who cryopreserved semen between 1983-2013. Intervention:: Follow-up of all ART treatments. Main outcome measures:: Usage rate of cryopreserved semen and success rate of assisted reproductive technology in achieving parenthood. Results:: 898 patients cryobanked their semen. 96 patients used their cryopreserved semen for ART (10,7%). The clinical pregnancy rate for intra-uterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and cryo embryo transfer (ET) were 14%, 37%, 38% and 18%, respectively. A total of 77% of the couples achieved parenthood. Conclusions:: Although the success rates of ART are impressive, the usage rate of cryopreserved semen in cancer patients is (too) low. ",

keywords = "cryopreservation, semen, cancer, assisted reproduction technology",

author = "I. Muller and {Oude Ophuis}, {R. J A} and Broekmans, {F. J M} and Lock, {M. T W T}",

year = "2015",

month = sep,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1007/s13629-015-0026-y",

language = "Dutch",

volume = "5",

pages = "120--126",

journal = "Tijdschrift voor Urologie",

issn = "2211-3037",

publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

number = "5",

}

Resultaten van semencryopreservatie en gebruik voor kunstmatige voortplantingstechnieken bij 898 mannen met kanker: Semencryopreservatie bij mannen met kanker. / Muller, I.; Oude Ophuis, R. J A; Broekmans, F. J M et al.
In: Tijdschrift voor Urologie, Vol. 5, No. 5, 28.09.2015, p. 120-126.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resultaten van semencryopreservatie en gebruik voor kunstmatige voortplantingstechnieken bij 898 mannen met kanker

T2 - Semencryopreservatie bij mannen met kanker

AU - Muller, I.

AU - Oude Ophuis, R. J A

AU - Broekmans, F. J M

AU - Lock, M. T W T

PY - 2015/9/28

Y1 - 2015/9/28

N2 - Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a non-academic center by a single surgeon in 94 cases Objective:: To determine how often cryopreserved semen from cancer patients is used and the success rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in this group. Design:: Retrospective data analysis. Setting:: Academic tertiary referral fertility centre. Patients:: 898 male cancer patients who cryopreserved semen between 1983-2013. Intervention:: Follow-up of all ART treatments. Main outcome measures:: Usage rate of cryopreserved semen and success rate of assisted reproductive technology in achieving parenthood. Results:: 898 patients cryobanked their semen. 96 patients used their cryopreserved semen for ART (10,7%). The clinical pregnancy rate for intra-uterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and cryo embryo transfer (ET) were 14%, 37%, 38% and 18%, respectively. A total of 77% of the couples achieved parenthood. Conclusions:: Although the success rates of ART are impressive, the usage rate of cryopreserved semen in cancer patients is (too) low.

AB - Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a non-academic center by a single surgeon in 94 cases Objective:: To determine how often cryopreserved semen from cancer patients is used and the success rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in this group. Design:: Retrospective data analysis. Setting:: Academic tertiary referral fertility centre. Patients:: 898 male cancer patients who cryopreserved semen between 1983-2013. Intervention:: Follow-up of all ART treatments. Main outcome measures:: Usage rate of cryopreserved semen and success rate of assisted reproductive technology in achieving parenthood. Results:: 898 patients cryobanked their semen. 96 patients used their cryopreserved semen for ART (10,7%). The clinical pregnancy rate for intra-uterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and cryo embryo transfer (ET) were 14%, 37%, 38% and 18%, respectively. A total of 77% of the couples achieved parenthood. Conclusions:: Although the success rates of ART are impressive, the usage rate of cryopreserved semen in cancer patients is (too) low.

KW - cryopreservation

KW - semen

KW - cancer

KW - assisted reproduction technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940503936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13629-015-0026-y

DO - 10.1007/s13629-015-0026-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84940503936

SN - 2211-3037

VL - 5

SP - 120

EP - 126

JO - Tijdschrift voor Urologie

JF - Tijdschrift voor Urologie

IS - 5

ER -

Resultaten van semencryopreservatie en gebruik voor kunstmatige voortplantingstechnieken bij 898 mannen met kanker: Semencryopreservatie bij mannen met kanker

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this