Reply. How much evidence is needed to stop calling endometrial scratching 'controversial'?

Nienke Van Hoogenhuijze
, Frank Broekmans

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	820-823
Number of pages	4
Journal	Human Reproduction Update
Volume	30
Issue number	6
Early online date	22 Jun 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmae019
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2024

Access to Document

10.1093/humupd/dmae019

dmae019Final published version, 498 KBLicence: Taverne

Other files and links

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

@article{866c882e3ff74df5b63f169474348f2b,

title = "Reply. How much evidence is needed to stop calling endometrial scratching 'controversial'?",

author = "\{Van Hoogenhuijze\}, Nienke and Frank Broekmans",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/humupd/dmae019",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "820--823",

journal = "Human Reproduction Update",

issn = "1355-4786",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply. How much evidence is needed to stop calling endometrial scratching 'controversial'?

AU - Van Hoogenhuijze, Nienke

AU - Broekmans, Frank

PY - 2024/12/1

Y1 - 2024/12/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208516319

U2 - 10.1093/humupd/dmae019

DO - 10.1093/humupd/dmae019

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 38908021

SN - 1355-4786

VL - 30

SP - 820

EP - 823

JO - Human Reproduction Update

JF - Human Reproduction Update

IS - 6

ER -