TY - JOUR
T1 - Relying on the external world
T2 - Individuals variably use low- and medium-loading, but rarely high-loading, strategies when engaging visual working memory
AU - Böing, S.
AU - de Zwart, B.
AU - Ten Brink, A. F.
AU - Nijboer, T. C.W.
AU - Van der Stigchel, S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In naturalistic environments, people typically rely on external sampling rather than fully using their visual working memory capacity. However, when sampling becomes costly, people memorize more (i.e., loading). To investigate individual differences in sampling versus loading strategy, participants (n=88) performed a copying task under low-cost (immediate accessibility) and high-cost (delayed accessibility) sampling conditions. Participants were categorized as low-loaders (sampling >1 per item), medium-loaders (loading ≥1 per inspection), and high-loaders (loading ≥3 per inspection). Both sampling cost and prior experience (low-cost first versus high-cost first) affected sampling frequency and category. Crucially, low- and medium-loading strategies were common, but individuals seldom exhibited a high-loading strategy that approached working memory capacity limits. Despite individual variation in their preferred strategy, participants flexibly adapted their sampling frequency to task demands without affecting performance. This suggests that while individuals show distinct working memory strategies, they can adjust these flexibly, balancing effort, goals, and prior experience.
AB - In naturalistic environments, people typically rely on external sampling rather than fully using their visual working memory capacity. However, when sampling becomes costly, people memorize more (i.e., loading). To investigate individual differences in sampling versus loading strategy, participants (n=88) performed a copying task under low-cost (immediate accessibility) and high-cost (delayed accessibility) sampling conditions. Participants were categorized as low-loaders (sampling >1 per item), medium-loaders (loading ≥1 per inspection), and high-loaders (loading ≥3 per inspection). Both sampling cost and prior experience (low-cost first versus high-cost first) affected sampling frequency and category. Crucially, low- and medium-loading strategies were common, but individuals seldom exhibited a high-loading strategy that approached working memory capacity limits. Despite individual variation in their preferred strategy, participants flexibly adapted their sampling frequency to task demands without affecting performance. This suggests that while individuals show distinct working memory strategies, they can adjust these flexibly, balancing effort, goals, and prior experience.
KW - copy task
KW - individual differences
KW - memory strategies
KW - Offloading
KW - sampling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002115616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13506285.2025.2484523
DO - 10.1080/13506285.2025.2484523
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002115616
SN - 1350-6285
VL - 32
SP - 657
EP - 674
JO - Visual Cognition
JF - Visual Cognition
IS - 8
ER -