Reduced brain activation during spoken language processing in children with developmental language disorder and children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Mariska J. Vansteensel*, Iris S. Selten, Lisette Charbonnier, Julia Berezutskaya, Mathijs A.H. Raemaekers, Nick F. Ramsey, Frank Wijnen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Language difficulties of children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) have been associated with multiple underlying factors and are still poorly understood. One way of investigating the mechanisms of DLD language problems is to compare language-related brain activation patterns of children with DLD to those of a population with similar language difficulties and a uniform etiology. Children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) constitute such a population. Here, we conducted an fMRI study, in which children (6-10yo) with DLD and 22q11DS listened to speech alternated with reversed speech. We compared language laterality and language-related brain activation levels with those of typically developing (TD) children who performed the same task. The data revealed no significant differences between groups in language lateralization, but task-related activation levels were lower in children with language impairment than in TD children in several nodes of the language network. We conclude that language impairment in children with DLD and in children with 22q11DS may involve (partially) overlapping cortical areas.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107907
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume158
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
  • Developmental language disorder
  • fMRI
  • Language laterality
  • Spoken language processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reduced brain activation during spoken language processing in children with developmental language disorder and children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this