Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recommendations for HLA Genotyping Data Standards and Clinical Laboratory Staffing Considerations

  • Eric Spierings*
  • , Nicholas K Brown
  • , Katy Latham
  • , James Robinson
  • , Mark Melchers
  • , Medhat Askar
  • , Gerald P Morris
  • , Eric Weimer
  • , Martin Maiers
  • , Abeer Madbouly
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The rapid advances in HLA genotyping technology and the massive amounts of associated data have created a demand for better and more efficient laboratory data management practices. However, while some standards have been developed, there is a need for comprehensive guidelines that include all laboratory data-related processes such as messaging, storage and retention, documentation, reporting, validation and quality control. An important consideration in developing these recommendations is the feasibility of application in a laboratory setting without posing a substantial staff and cost burden for implementation and long-term maintenance and the availability of publicly available tools. This article presents evidence-based recommendations for multiple laboratory general data practices, focusing on HLA genotyping data and associated meta-data. These recommendations are compiled by experts in the fields of histocompatibility and immunogenetics (H&I) and representation from multiple H&I worldwide professional society leadership with the long-term goal of adopting these recommendations in future laboratory accreditation requirements.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70725
JournalHLA
Volume107
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Keywords

  • Humans
  • HLA Antigens/genetics
  • Laboratories, Clinical/standards
  • Genotype
  • Histocompatibility Testing/standards
  • Genotyping Techniques/standards
  • Quality Control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for HLA Genotyping Data Standards and Clinical Laboratory Staffing Considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this