Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-world data reveals the complexity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment patterns in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an observational study

  • Luiza R. Grazziotin
  • , Gillian Currie
  • , Marinka Twilt
  • , Maarten J. Ijzerman
  • , Michelle M.A. Kip
  • , Hendrik Koffijberg
  • , Susanne M. Benseler
  • , Joost F. Swart
  • , Sebastiaan J. Vastert
  • , Nico M. Wulffraat
  • , Rae S.M. Yeung
  • , Deborah A. Marshall*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological treatment is a cornerstone of care for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The objective of this study is to evaluate prescription patterns of conventional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs) for patients with JIA.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children diagnosed with JIA at a rheumatology pediatric clinic. Eligibility criteria were defined as children and youth newly diagnosed with enthesis-related arthritis, polyarticular, or oligoarticular JIA between 2011 and 2019, with at least one year of observation. Data on c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs prescriptions were obtained from electronic medical charts. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and Sankey diagrams to describe treatment prescription patterns.

RESULTS: A total of 325 patients with JIA were included, with a median observation time of 3.7 years. The most frequently prescribed c-DMARD and b-DMARD were methotrexate and etanercept, respectively. Within the first year of rheumatology care, 62% and 21% of patients had a c-DMARD and a b-DMARD prescribed, respectively. These proportions varied greatly by JIA subtype. Among the 147 (147/325, 45%) patients that had at least one b-DMARD prescribed, 24% were prescribed a second, and 7% a third-line of b-DMARD. A total of 112 unique treatment sequences were observed, with c-DMARD monotherapy followed by the addition of either a b-DMARD (56%) or another c-DMARD (30%) being the two most prevalent patterns in this cohort.

CONCLUSION: We observed a variety of treatment trajectories, with many patients experiencing multiple treatment lines, illustrating the complexity of the overall JIA treatment path.

Original languageEnglish
Article number25
Pages (from-to)1-11
JournalPediatric rheumatology online journal
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Arthritis, Juvenile/diagnosis
  • Child
  • Etanercept/therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Methotrexate
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs
  • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • Treatment patterns
  • Biologic therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world data reveals the complexity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment patterns in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this