TY - JOUR
T1 - Real world data on digital remote refraction in a healthy population of 14,680 eyes
AU - van der Zee, Casper
AU - Jamal, Heshow
AU - Muijzer, Marc
AU - Frank, Laurence
AU - Vink, Gerko
AU - Wisse, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/2/6
Y1 - 2025/2/6
N2 - Refractive errors are the leading cause of preventable visual impairment, to which web-based remote refraction could contribute. We report real-world 2021–2022 data of the underlying algorithm and validated these to conventional prescriptions among healthy individuals (high visual acuity and satisfactied current refraction). Participants were 18–45 years with a spherical (S) error between −3.50 + 2.00S to −2.00 Diopter Cylinder (DC), reported as Spherical Equivalent (SEQ) in mean differences and 95% Limits of agreement. Consecutive measurements (n = 14,680) were assessed of which n = 6386 selected for validation. The mean difference was 0.01D(SD 0.69) and −0.73D(SD 0.92) for myopes and hyperopes respectively. This algorithm shows variation, nonetheless, 67% and 82% of myopes were within ±0.5 and ±0.75D. The test underestimates hyperopes (34% and 50% within ±0.5D and ±0.75D) and had inconsistencies distinguishing hyperopia. This proof-of-concept shows home testing has the potency to increase accessibility to care by delivering a valuable alternative for uncomplicated refractive assessments.
AB - Refractive errors are the leading cause of preventable visual impairment, to which web-based remote refraction could contribute. We report real-world 2021–2022 data of the underlying algorithm and validated these to conventional prescriptions among healthy individuals (high visual acuity and satisfactied current refraction). Participants were 18–45 years with a spherical (S) error between −3.50 + 2.00S to −2.00 Diopter Cylinder (DC), reported as Spherical Equivalent (SEQ) in mean differences and 95% Limits of agreement. Consecutive measurements (n = 14,680) were assessed of which n = 6386 selected for validation. The mean difference was 0.01D(SD 0.69) and −0.73D(SD 0.92) for myopes and hyperopes respectively. This algorithm shows variation, nonetheless, 67% and 82% of myopes were within ±0.5 and ±0.75D. The test underestimates hyperopes (34% and 50% within ±0.5D and ±0.75D) and had inconsistencies distinguishing hyperopia. This proof-of-concept shows home testing has the potency to increase accessibility to care by delivering a valuable alternative for uncomplicated refractive assessments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004649628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41746-025-01453-0
DO - 10.1038/s41746-025-01453-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105004649628
SN - 2398-6352
VL - 8
JO - NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE
JF - NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE
IS - 1
M1 - 89
ER -