TY - JOUR
T1 - Real-world comparison of the effects of etanercept and adalimumab on well-being in non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis
T2 - a propensity score matched cohort study
AU - van Straalen, Joeri W.
AU - de Roock, Sytze
AU - Giancane, Gabriella
AU - Consolaro, Alessandro
AU - Rygg, Marite
AU - Nordal, Ellen B.
AU - Rubio-Pérez, Nadina
AU - Jelusic, Marija
AU - De Inocencio, Jaime
AU - Vojinovic, Jelena
AU - Wulffraat, Nico M.
AU - Bruijning-Verhagen, Patricia C.J.
AU - Ruperto, Nicolino
AU - Swart, Joost F.
AU - Pallotti, Chiara
AU - Scala, Silvia
AU - Angioloni, Simona
AU - Villa, Luca
N1 - Funding Information:
AC reports speaking fees from AbbVie and Pfizer and a research grant from Pfizer. NR has received honoraria for consultancies or speaker bureaus from the following pharmaceutical companies in the past 3 years: 2 Bridge, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Bayer, Brystol Myers and Squibb, Celgene, inMed, Cambridge Healthcare Research, Domain Therapeutic, EMD Serono, Glaxo Smith Kline, Idorsia, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sobi, UCB. All other authors declare no conflict of interest for this manuscript.
Funding Information:
Pharmachild has been supported by a grant from the European Union (grant 260353), by the Dutch ZonMW (grant PharmachildNL 80–83600-98–21012) and by funding from the IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini (Genoa, Italy).
Funding Information:
The authors thank all PRINTO centers for contributing to the data collection and PRINTO research assistants (Chiara Pallotti, Silvia Scala, Simona Angioloni and Luca Villa). The authors would also like to express their acknowledgements to the European Reference Network for Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory, Autoimmune and Pediatric Rheumatic diseases (ERN-RITA). Lastly, we thank all patients and their parents for consenting to this research. Permission for use of JAMAR and its translations must be obtained in writing from PRINTO, Genoa, Italy. All JAMAR-related inquiries should be directed to at [email protected]. Permission for use of CHAQ and CHQ derived-material is granted through the scientific cooperation of the copyright holder ICORE of Woodside CA and HealthActCHQ Inc. of Boston, Massachusetts USA. All CHQ-related inquiries should be directed to [email protected]. All CHAQ-related inquiries should be directed to [email protected].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/11/14
Y1 - 2022/11/14
N2 - Background: Etanercept (ETN) and adalimumab (ADA) are considered equally effective biologicals in the treatment of arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) but no studies have compared their impact on patient-reported well-being. The objective of this study was to determine whether ETN and ADA have a differential effect on patient-reported well-being in non-systemic JIA using real-world data. Methods: Biological-naive patients without a history of uveitis were selected from the international Pharmachild registry. Patients starting ETN were matched to patients starting ADA based on propensity score and outcomes were collected at time of therapy initiation and 3–12 months afterwards. Primary outcome at follow-up was the improvement in Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) visual analogue scale (VAS) well-being score from baseline. Secondary outcomes at follow-up were decrease in active joint count, adverse events and uveitis events. Outcomes were analyzed using linear and logistic mixed effects models. Results: Out of 158 eligible patients, 45 ETN starters and 45 ADA starters could be propensity score matched resulting in similar VAS well-being scores at baseline. At follow-up, the median improvement in VAS well-being was 2 (interquartile range (IQR): 0.0 – 4.0) and scores were significantly better (P = 0.01) for ETN starters (median 0.0, IQR: 0.0 – 1.0) compared to ADA starters (median 1.0, IQR: 0.0 – 3.5). The estimated mean difference in VAS well-being improvement from baseline for ETN versus ADA was 0.89 (95% CI: -0.01 – 1.78; P = 0.06). The estimated mean difference in active joint count decrease was -0.36 (95% CI: -1.02 – 0.30; P = 0.28) and odds ratio for adverse events was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.16 –1.44; P = 0.19). One uveitis event was observed in the ETN group. Conclusions: Both ETN and ADA improve well-being in non-systemic JIA. Our data might indicate a trend towards a slightly stronger effect for ETN, but larger studies are needed to confirm this given the lack of statistical significance.
AB - Background: Etanercept (ETN) and adalimumab (ADA) are considered equally effective biologicals in the treatment of arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) but no studies have compared their impact on patient-reported well-being. The objective of this study was to determine whether ETN and ADA have a differential effect on patient-reported well-being in non-systemic JIA using real-world data. Methods: Biological-naive patients without a history of uveitis were selected from the international Pharmachild registry. Patients starting ETN were matched to patients starting ADA based on propensity score and outcomes were collected at time of therapy initiation and 3–12 months afterwards. Primary outcome at follow-up was the improvement in Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) visual analogue scale (VAS) well-being score from baseline. Secondary outcomes at follow-up were decrease in active joint count, adverse events and uveitis events. Outcomes were analyzed using linear and logistic mixed effects models. Results: Out of 158 eligible patients, 45 ETN starters and 45 ADA starters could be propensity score matched resulting in similar VAS well-being scores at baseline. At follow-up, the median improvement in VAS well-being was 2 (interquartile range (IQR): 0.0 – 4.0) and scores were significantly better (P = 0.01) for ETN starters (median 0.0, IQR: 0.0 – 1.0) compared to ADA starters (median 1.0, IQR: 0.0 – 3.5). The estimated mean difference in VAS well-being improvement from baseline for ETN versus ADA was 0.89 (95% CI: -0.01 – 1.78; P = 0.06). The estimated mean difference in active joint count decrease was -0.36 (95% CI: -1.02 – 0.30; P = 0.28) and odds ratio for adverse events was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.16 –1.44; P = 0.19). One uveitis event was observed in the ETN group. Conclusions: Both ETN and ADA improve well-being in non-systemic JIA. Our data might indicate a trend towards a slightly stronger effect for ETN, but larger studies are needed to confirm this given the lack of statistical significance.
KW - Adalimumab/therapeutic use
KW - Antirheumatic Agents
KW - Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Etanercept/adverse effects
KW - Humans
KW - Propensity Score
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Uveitis/drug therapy
KW - Real-world data
KW - Propensity score analysis
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
KW - Etanercept
KW - Patient-reported outcomes
KW - Adalimumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141967010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12969-022-00763-x
DO - 10.1186/s12969-022-00763-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 36376976
SN - 1546-0096
VL - 20
JO - Pediatric rheumatology online journal
JF - Pediatric rheumatology online journal
IS - 1
M1 - 96
ER -