TY - JOUR
T1 - Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio
T2 - results of the ADVISE in-practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice
AU - Petraco, Ricardo
AU - Al-Lamee, Rasha
AU - Gotberg, Matthias
AU - Sharp, Andrew
AU - Hellig, Farrel
AU - Nijjer, Sukhjinder S
AU - Echavarria-Pinto, Mauro
AU - van de Hoef, Tim P
AU - Sen, Sayan
AU - Tanaka, Nobuhiro
AU - Van Belle, Eric
AU - Bojara, Waldemar
AU - Sakoda, Kunihiro
AU - Mates, Martin
AU - Indolfi, Ciro
AU - De Rosa, Salvatore
AU - Vrints, Christian J
AU - Haine, Steven
AU - Yokoi, Hiroyoshi
AU - Ribichini, Flavio L
AU - Meuwissen, Martjin
AU - Matsuo, Hitoshi
AU - Janssens, Luc
AU - Katsumi, Ueno
AU - Di Mario, Carlo
AU - Escaned, Javier
AU - Piek, Jan
AU - Davies, Justin E
N1 - Copyright © 2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/11
Y1 - 2014/11
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians.BACKGROUND: The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed.METHODS: Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated.RESULTS: Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROC(AUC) 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROC(AUC) 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification.CONCLUSION: When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians.BACKGROUND: The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed.METHODS: Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated.RESULTS: Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROC(AUC) 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROC(AUC) 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification.CONCLUSION: When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.
KW - Aged
KW - Area Under Curve
KW - Cardiac Catheterization/methods
KW - Case-Control Studies
KW - Coronary Angiography/methods
KW - Coronary Circulation
KW - Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis
KW - Female
KW - Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - ROC Curve
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Severity of Illness Index
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.022
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 25440803
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 168
SP - 739
EP - 748
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 5
ER -