Re: Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure?

Amand F. Schmidt
, Frank Dudbridge
, Rolf H H Groenwold

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e12-e12
Number of pages	1
Journal	Epidemiology
Volume	27
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444
Publication status	Published - May 2016

Access to Document

10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444

24Final published version, 303 KBLicence: Taverne

Other files and links

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

@article{34c89f78025146f49642ba4976ca1f6e,

title = "Re: Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure?",

author = "Schmidt, \{Amand F.\} and Frank Dudbridge and Groenwold, \{Rolf H H\}",

year = "2016",

month = may,

doi = "10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "e12--e12",

journal = "Epidemiology",

issn = "1044-3983",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams \& Wilkins",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re: Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure?

AU - Schmidt, Amand F.

AU - Dudbridge, Frank

AU - Groenwold, Rolf H H

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964077791

U2 - 10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444

DO - 10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:84964077791

SN - 1044-3983

VL - 27

SP - e12-e12

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

IS - 3

ER -