Rate of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Susan Byrne, Cathal Walsh, Catherine Lynch, Peter Bede, Marwa Elamin, Kevin Kenna, Russell McLaughlin, Orla Hardiman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The population rate of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FALS) is frequently reported as 10%. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the true population based frequency of FALS has never been performed.

METHOD: A Medline literature review identified all original articles reporting a rate of FALS. Studies were grouped according to the type of data presented and examined for sources of case ascertainment. A systematic review and meta-analysis of reported rates of FALS was then conducted to facilitate comparison between studies and calculate a pooled rate of FALS.

RESULTS: 38 papers reported a rate of FALS. Thirty-three papers were included in analysis and the rate of FALS for all studies was 4.6% (95% CI 3.9% to 5.5%). Restricting the analysis to prospective population based registry data revealed a rate of 5.1% (95% CI 4.1% to 6.1%). The incidence of FALS was lower in southern Europe. There was no correlation between rate of FALS and reported SOD1 mutation rates.

CONCLUSION: The rate of FALS among prospective population based registries is 5.1% (CI 4.1 to 6.1%), and not 10% as is often stated. Further detailed prospective population based studies of familial ALS are required to confirm this rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)623-7
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
Volume82
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Mutation
  • Superoxide Dismutase/genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rate of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this