Rare disease registries: Potential applications towards impact on development of new drug treatments

Marijke C. Jansen-Van Der Weide*, Charlotte M.W. Gaasterland, Kit C.B. Roes, Caridad Pontes, Roser Vives, Arantxa Sancho, Stavros Nikolakopoulos, Eric Vermeulen, Johanna H. Van Der Lee

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


    Background: Low prevalence, lack of knowledge about the disease course, and phenotype heterogeneity hamper the development of drugs for rare diseases. Rare disease registries (RDRs) can be helpful by playing a role in understanding the course of the disease, and providing information necessary for clinical trial design, if designed and maintained properly. We describe the potential applications of a RDR and what type of information should be incorporated to support the design of clinical trials in the process of drug development, based on a broad inventory of registry experience. We evaluated two existing RDRs in more detail to check the completeness of these RDRs for trial design. Results: Before and during the application for regulatory approval a RDR can improve the efficiency and quality in clinical trial design by informing the sample size calculation and expected disease course. In exceptional circumstances information from RDRs has been used as historical controls for a one-armed clinical trial, and high quality RDRs may be used for registry-based randomized controlled trials. In the post marketing phase of (conditional) drug approval a disease-specific RDR is likely to provide more relevant information than a product-specific registry. Conclusions: A RDR can be very helpful to improve the efficiency and quality of clinical trial design in several ways. To enable the applicability and optimal use of a RDR longitudinal data collection is indispensable, and specific data collection, prepared for repeated measurement, is needed. The developed checklist can help to define the appropriate variables to include. Attention should be paid to the inclusion of patient-relevant outcome measures in the RDR from the start. More research and experience is needed on the possibilities and limitations of combining RDR information with clinical trial data to maximize the availability of relevant evidence for regulatory decisions in rare diseases.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number154
    Number of pages11
    JournalOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 5 Sept 2018


    • Clinical trial
    • Drug development
    • Rare disease
    • Registry


    Dive into the research topics of 'Rare disease registries: Potential applications towards impact on development of new drug treatments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this