TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid Viral Testing and Antibiotic Prescription in Febrile Children with Respiratory Symptoms Visiting Emergency Departments in Europe
AU - Tan, Chantal D.
AU - Hagedoorn, Nienke N.
AU - Dewez, Juan E.
AU - Borensztajn, Dorine M.
AU - Von Both, Ulrich
AU - Carrol, Enitan D.
AU - Emonts, Marieke
AU - Van Der Flier, Michiel
AU - De Groot, Ronald
AU - Herberg, Jethro
AU - Kohlmaier, Benno
AU - Levin, Michael
AU - Lim, Emma
AU - MacOnochie, Ian K.
AU - Martinon-Torres, Federico
AU - Nijman, Ruud G.
AU - Pokorn, Marko
AU - Rivero-Calle, Irene
AU - Strle, Franc
AU - Tsolia, Maria
AU - Vermont, Clementien L.
AU - Yeung, Shunmay
AU - Zachariasse, Joany M.
AU - Zenz, Werner
AU - Zavadska, Dace
AU - Moll, Henriette A.
N1 - Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Background. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing often occurs in children with self-limiting respiratory tract infections, contributing to antimicrobial resistance. It has been suggested that rapid viral testing can reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. We aimed to assess the association between rapid viral testing at the Emergency Department (ED) and antibiotic prescription in febrile children. Methods. This study is part of the MOFICHE study, which is an observational multicenter study including routine data of febrile children (0-18 years) attending 12 European EDs. In children with respiratory symptoms visiting 6 EDs equipped with rapid viral testing, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis regarding rapid viral testing and antibiotic prescription adjusted for patient characteristics, disease severity, diagnostic tests, focus of infection, admission, and ED. Results. A rapid viral test was performed in 1061 children (8%) and not performed in 11,463 children. Rapid viral test usage was not associated with antibiotic prescription (aOR 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-1.1). A positive rapid viral test was associated with less antibiotic prescription compared with children without test performed (aOR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.8), which remained significant after adjustment for CRP and chest radiograph result. Twenty percent of the positively tested children received antibiotics. A negative rapid viral test was not associated with antibiotic prescription (aOR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4). Conclusions. Rapid viral test usage did not reduce overall antibiotic prescription, whereas a positive rapid viral test did reduce antibiotic prescription at the ED. Implementation of rapid viral testing in routine emergency care and compliance to the rapid viral test outcome will reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing at the ED.
AB - Background. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing often occurs in children with self-limiting respiratory tract infections, contributing to antimicrobial resistance. It has been suggested that rapid viral testing can reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. We aimed to assess the association between rapid viral testing at the Emergency Department (ED) and antibiotic prescription in febrile children. Methods. This study is part of the MOFICHE study, which is an observational multicenter study including routine data of febrile children (0-18 years) attending 12 European EDs. In children with respiratory symptoms visiting 6 EDs equipped with rapid viral testing, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis regarding rapid viral testing and antibiotic prescription adjusted for patient characteristics, disease severity, diagnostic tests, focus of infection, admission, and ED. Results. A rapid viral test was performed in 1061 children (8%) and not performed in 11,463 children. Rapid viral test usage was not associated with antibiotic prescription (aOR 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-1.1). A positive rapid viral test was associated with less antibiotic prescription compared with children without test performed (aOR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.8), which remained significant after adjustment for CRP and chest radiograph result. Twenty percent of the positively tested children received antibiotics. A negative rapid viral test was not associated with antibiotic prescription (aOR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4). Conclusions. Rapid viral test usage did not reduce overall antibiotic prescription, whereas a positive rapid viral test did reduce antibiotic prescription at the ED. Implementation of rapid viral testing in routine emergency care and compliance to the rapid viral test outcome will reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing at the ED.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Child
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data
KW - Europe
KW - Female
KW - Fever/drug therapy
KW - Humans
KW - Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data
KW - Infant
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Male
KW - Prescriptions
KW - Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis
KW - Virus Diseases/diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122033038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/INF.0000000000003326
DO - 10.1097/INF.0000000000003326
M3 - Article
C2 - 34862345
AN - SCOPUS:85122033038
SN - 0891-3668
VL - 41
SP - 39
EP - 44
JO - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
JF - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
IS - 1
ER -